PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Portfolios
Screeners
Discussions
JANT vs. SIXJ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between JANT and SIXJ is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

JANT vs. SIXJ

Last updated Jun 2, 2025

Compare and contrast key facts about AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ).

JANT and SIXJ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JANT is an actively managed fund by Allianz. It was launched on Dec 31, 2020. SIXJ is a passively managed fund by Allianz that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Dec 31, 2021.

Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JANT or SIXJ.

Performance

JANT vs. SIXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

JANT:

0.79

SIXJ:

0.88

Sortino Ratio

JANT:

1.12

SIXJ:

1.31

Omega Ratio

JANT:

1.20

SIXJ:

1.22

Calmar Ratio

JANT:

0.69

SIXJ:

0.86

Martin Ratio

JANT:

2.97

SIXJ:

3.93

Ulcer Index

JANT:

3.08%

SIXJ:

2.38%

Daily Std Dev

JANT:

12.53%

SIXJ:

10.88%

Max Drawdown

JANT:

-16.18%

SIXJ:

-14.08%

Current Drawdown

JANT:

-1.72%

SIXJ:

-1.28%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANT achieves a 1.20% return, which is significantly lower than SIXJ's 1.33% return.

JANT

YTD

1.20%

1M

2.87%

6M

1.77%

1Y

9.27%

3Y*

12.03%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

SIXJ

YTD

1.33%

1M

1.92%

6M

1.89%

1Y

9.44%

3Y*

8.84%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF

JANT vs. SIXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JANT and SIXJ have an expense ratio of 0.74%.

JANT
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF
SIXJ
AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF
Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

JANT vs. SIXJ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
JANT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of JANT is 6868
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of JANT is 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of JANT is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of JANT is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of JANT is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of JANT is 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
SIXJ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SIXJ is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SIXJ is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SIXJ is 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SIXJ is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SIXJ is 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SIXJ is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

JANT vs. SIXJ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current JANT Sharpe Ratio is 0.79, which is comparable to the SIXJ Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANT and SIXJ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

JANT vs. SIXJ - Dividend Comparison

Neither JANT nor SIXJ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

JANT vs. SIXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANT drawdown since its inception was -16.18%, which is greater than SIXJ's maximum drawdown of -14.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANT and SIXJ.

Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

JANT vs. SIXJ - Volatility Comparison

AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Jan ETF (JANT) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap 6 Month Buffer10 Jan/Jul ETF (SIXJ) at 2.37%. This indicates that JANT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading data...