JANRX vs. FGIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson Global Select Fund (JANRX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX).
JANRX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jun 29, 2000. FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007.
Performance
JANRX vs. FGIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JANRX vs. FGIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANRX Janus Henderson Global Select Fund | -1.14% | 19.49% | 17.21% | 17.41% | -9.94% | 15.96% | 16.14% | 27.43% | -9.80% | 31.08% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JANRX achieves a -1.14% return, which is significantly lower than FGIAX's 10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, JANRX has outperformed FGIAX with an annualized return of 12.32%, while FGIAX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.78% annualized return.
JANRX
- 1D
- 2.90%
- 1M
- -6.23%
- YTD
- -1.14%
- 6M
- -0.41%
- 1Y
- 20.55%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 9.67%
- 10Y*
- 12.32%
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JANRX vs. FGIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JANRX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIAX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JANRX vs. FGIAX — Risk / Return Rank
JANRX
FGIAX
JANRX vs. FGIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Select Fund (JANRX) and Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JANRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.33 | 1.79 | -0.46 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 2.30 | -0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.36 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.73 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.61 | 12.62 | -5.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JANRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 1.79 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.80 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.69 | 0.58 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.42 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between JANRX and FGIAX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JANRX vs. FGIAX - Dividend Comparison
JANRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.83%, more than FGIAX's 9.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JANRX Janus Henderson Global Select Fund | 10.83% | 10.71% | 10.44% | 8.62% | 2.81% | 13.04% | 5.11% | 4.37% | 17.07% | 0.86% | 1.14% | 1.08% |
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
Drawdowns
JANRX vs. FGIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANRX drawdown since its inception was -63.94%, which is greater than FGIAX's maximum drawdown of -49.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANRX and FGIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.94% | -49.35% | -14.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | -8.29% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.48% | -21.08% | -2.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.17% | -38.02% | -1.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.05% | -3.06% | -3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.90% | -7.22% | -10.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 1.79% | +0.82% |
Volatility
JANRX vs. FGIAX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson Global Select Fund (JANRX) has a higher volatility of 5.57% compared to Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) at 4.15%. This indicates that JANRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JANRX | FGIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.57% | 4.15% | +1.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.78% | 7.07% | +1.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.03% | 12.28% | +3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.10% | 13.08% | +3.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.95% | 15.17% | +2.78% |