JANM vs. UXJL
JANM (FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from First Trust. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.85% expense ratio.
Performance
JANM vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JANM achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 7.99% return.
JANM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 2.24%
- 6M
- 2.35%
- 1Y
- 6.83%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -2.79%
- YTD
- 7.99%
- 6M
- 6.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JANM vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JANM FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January | 2.24% | 3.51% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 7.99% | 8.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between JANM and UXJL is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JANM vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank
JANM
UXJL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JANM vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Max Buffer ETF - January (JANM) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JANM | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.62 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JANM vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JANM drawdown since its inception was -2.83%, smaller than the maximum UXJL drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANM and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JANM | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -10.29% | +7.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -4.12% | +3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -1.60% | +1.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.32% | — | — |
Volatility
JANM vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JANM | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.93% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37% | 14.53% | -12.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.91% | 14.53% | -11.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.91% | 14.53% | -11.62% |
JANM vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JANM and UXJL have an expense ratio of 0.85%.
Dividends
JANM vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither JANM nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JANM and UXJL have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.85% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JANM and UXJL have the same expense ratio: 0.85% per year.
JANM and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for JANM and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer