PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANBX vs. MHELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANBX vs. MHELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANBX achieves a 3.37% return, which is significantly lower than MHELX's 19.20% return. Over the past 10 years, JANBX has outperformed MHELX with an annualized return of 10.29%, while MHELX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.08% annualized return.


JANBX

1D
-0.54%
1M
2.14%
YTD
3.37%
6M
3.46%
1Y
14.09%
3Y*
13.83%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*
10.29%

MHELX

1D
1.32%
1M
3.73%
YTD
19.20%
6M
20.13%
1Y
38.99%
3Y*
15.78%
5Y*
5.28%
10Y*
9.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANBX vs. MHELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JANBX
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund
3.37%14.99%15.36%15.38%-16.60%17.22%14.34%22.53%0.64%17.78%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
19.20%3.45%12.51%16.30%-20.27%14.07%20.57%22.49%-12.76%12.42%

Correlation

The correlation between JANBX and MHELX is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 1998

0.75

Over the past year, the correlation between JANBX and MHELX has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANBX vs. MHELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANBX
JANBX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
JANBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANBX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
JANBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

MHELX
MHELX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MHELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MHELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MHELX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
MHELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
MHELX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANBX vs. MHELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) and MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JANBXMHELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.41

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

4.86

-3.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

16.42

-8.64

JANBX vs. MHELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the MHELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANBX and MHELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JANBXMHELXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.15

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.25

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

0.43

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.33

+0.35

Drawdowns

JANBX vs. MHELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANBX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum MHELX drawdown of -61.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANBX and MHELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANBXMHELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.70%

-61.24%

+29.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-8.52%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.91%

-30.81%

+18.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.52%

-32.01%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.49%

-39.02%

+16.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

0.00%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-12.93%

+6.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

2.51%

-0.63%

Volatility

JANBX vs. MHELX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) is 2.50%, while MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund (MHELX) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that JANBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MHELX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANBXMHELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.50%

4.69%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.91%

15.28%

-8.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.71%

19.26%

-10.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.19%

21.01%

-9.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.16%

20.97%

-9.81%

JANBX vs. MHELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANBX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MHELX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANBX vs. MHELX - Dividend Comparison

JANBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.54%, more than MHELX's 6.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JANBX
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund
8.54%8.78%6.96%2.25%1.95%4.50%2.49%2.85%7.06%4.65%2.55%5.81%
MHELX
MH Elite Small Cap Fund of Funds Fund
6.05%0.00%2.19%0.00%14.45%5.03%2.70%6.13%0.00%5.17%5.51%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


JANBX and MHELX have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MHELX has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to JANBX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANBX dropped -31.70% vs MHELX's -61.24%.

MHELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANBX and MHELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer