PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JANBX vs. FDFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JANBX vs. FDFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JANBX achieves a 2.68% return, which is significantly lower than FDFIX's 7.92% return.


JANBX

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
2.68%
6M
1.88%
1Y
11.36%
3Y*
13.41%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*
10.46%

FDFIX

1D
-0.13%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
7.92%
6M
6.60%
1Y
21.75%
3Y*
20.62%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JANBX vs. FDFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JANBX
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund
2.68%14.99%15.36%15.38%-16.60%17.22%14.34%22.53%0.64%12.00%
FDFIX
Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund
7.92%17.59%25.06%26.27%-18.10%28.69%18.46%31.47%-4.45%14.41%

Correlation

The correlation between JANBX and FDFIX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2017

0.96

The correlation between JANBX and FDFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JANBX vs. FDFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JANBX
JANBX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
JANBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JANBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
JANBX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
JANBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
JANBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FDFIX
FDFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FDFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FDFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JANBX vs. FDFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) and Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JANBXFDFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.31

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

2.44

-1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

10.65

-4.50

JANBX vs. FDFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JANBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the FDFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JANBX and FDFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JANBX vs. FDFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JANBX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum FDFIX drawdown of -33.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JANBX and FDFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JANBXFDFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.70%

-33.77%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.13%

-8.99%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.91%

-18.76%

+6.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.52%

-24.51%

+2.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-3.24%

+1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-4.56%

-2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.05%

-0.15%

Volatility

JANBX vs. FDFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund (JANBX) is 3.67%, while Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund (FDFIX) has a volatility of 5.01%. This indicates that JANBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JANBXFDFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

5.01%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.56%

10.02%

-2.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.23%

12.68%

-3.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.28%

17.06%

-5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.19%

18.59%

-7.40%

JANBX vs. FDFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JANBX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FDFIX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

JANBX vs. FDFIX - Dividend Comparison

JANBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.60%, more than FDFIX's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDFIX
Fidelity Flex 500 Index Fund
1.06%1.11%1.26%1.48%1.70%1.27%1.52%1.78%2.16%0.50%0.00%0.00%
JANBX
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund
8.60%8.78%6.96%2.25%1.95%4.50%2.49%2.85%7.06%4.65%2.55%5.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, JANBX and FDFIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FDFIX has higher volatility (5.01%) compared to JANBX (3.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JANBX dropped -31.70% vs FDFIX's -33.77%.

FDFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JANBX and FDFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer