PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAMRX vs. MRFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAMRX vs. MRFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAMRX achieves a 9.20% return, which is significantly higher than MRFOX's -0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, JAMRX has outperformed MRFOX with an annualized return of 17.24%, while MRFOX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.41% annualized return.


JAMRX

1D
-0.23%
1M
7.60%
YTD
9.20%
6M
8.72%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
28.26%
5Y*
15.88%
10Y*
17.24%

MRFOX

1D
-0.41%
1M
-1.68%
YTD
-0.99%
6M
-1.78%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
13.82%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*
15.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAMRX vs. MRFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JAMRX
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I
9.20%18.32%41.65%43.02%-30.03%20.08%32.67%35.28%-2.84%25.89%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
-0.99%10.05%17.10%17.68%5.06%17.71%15.19%36.26%1.89%25.92%

Correlation

The correlation between JAMRX and MRFOX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between JAMRX and MRFOX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAMRX vs. MRFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAMRX
JAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
JAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
JAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

MRFOX
MRFOX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
MRFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
MRFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAMRX vs. MRFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) and Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JAMRXMRFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.09

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.54

0.66

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.31

1.90

+3.41

JAMRX vs. MRFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAMRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the MRFOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAMRX and MRFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JAMRXMRFOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

0.48

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.91

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

1.09

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

1.06

-0.47

Drawdowns

JAMRX vs. MRFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAMRX drawdown since its inception was -71.20%, which is greater than MRFOX's maximum drawdown of -29.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAMRX and MRFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAMRXMRFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.20%

-29.10%

-42.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.09%

-7.03%

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

-7.91%

-14.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.53%

-12.98%

-23.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.53%

-29.10%

-7.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

-3.39%

+3.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.65%

-2.37%

-19.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

2.44%

+2.51%

Volatility

JAMRX vs. MRFOX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund (MRFOX) at 2.49%. This indicates that JAMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MRFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAMRXMRFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

2.49%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

6.94%

+5.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.87%

9.77%

+6.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.13%

12.06%

+10.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.37%

14.26%

+7.11%

JAMRX vs. MRFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAMRX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than MRFOX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAMRX vs. MRFOX - Dividend Comparison

JAMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.97%, more than MRFOX's 1.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAMRX
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I
10.97%11.98%10.22%2.88%0.28%13.02%2.91%10.27%10.92%8.17%5.60%9.61%
MRFOX
Marshfield Concentrated Opportunity Fund
1.64%1.62%4.59%0.46%0.35%6.78%2.68%1.39%1.94%2.06%0.60%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAMRX and MRFOX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JAMRX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to MRFOX (2.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAMRX dropped -71.20% vs MRFOX's -29.10%.

JAMRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAMRX and MRFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer