PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAMRX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAMRX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAMRX achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 0.30% return.


JAMRX

1D
1.26%
1M
-2.02%
6M
3.68%
YTD
2.38%
1Y
9.27%
3Y*
22.62%
5Y*
12.55%
10Y*
16.11%
ALL TIME*
12.41%

FSPGX

1D
0.83%
1M
-2.42%
6M
1.53%
YTD
0.30%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
19.35%
5Y*
11.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JAMRX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JAMRX
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I
2.38%18.32%41.65%43.02%-30.03%20.08%32.67%35.28%-2.84%25.89%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.30%18.54%33.27%42.77%-29.17%27.57%38.46%36.38%-1.79%27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between JAMRX and FSPGX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.98

The correlation between JAMRX and FSPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAMRX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JAMRX
JAMRX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
JAMRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAMRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAMRX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
JAMRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAMRX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JAMRX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JAMRXFSPGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.09

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

0.50

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.32

1.49

-0.16

JAMRX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAMRX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is comparable to the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAMRX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JAMRX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAMRX drawdown since its inception was -71.20%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAMRX and FSPGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAMRXFSPGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.20%

-32.66%

-38.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.09%

-16.17%

-0.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.66%

-23.32%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.53%

-32.66%

-3.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.46%

-7.99%

+1.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.56%

-6.36%

-15.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

5.40%

-0.03%

Volatility

JAMRX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I (JAMRX) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) at 6.43%. This indicates that JAMRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAMRXFSPGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

6.43%

+0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.34%

14.04%

+1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

17.51%

+1.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.53%

21.80%

+0.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.54%

21.58%

-0.04%

JAMRX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAMRX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAMRX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

JAMRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.70%, more than FSPGX's 0.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.39%0.34%0.37%0.73%0.86%2.22%1.76%1.04%1.32%0.22%0.00%0.00%
JAMRX
Janus Henderson Research Fund Class I
11.70%11.98%10.22%2.88%0.28%13.02%2.91%10.27%10.92%8.17%5.60%9.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, JAMRX and FSPGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JAMRX has higher volatility (6.94%) compared to FSPGX (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAMRX dropped -71.20% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

FSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.46 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAMRX and FSPGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer