JAKVX vs. HSGFX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) and Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX).

JAKVX is an actively managed fund by John Hancock. It was launched on Apr 11, 2014. HSGFX is managed by Hussman Funds. It was launched on Jul 24, 2000.

Performance

JAKVX vs. HSGFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) and Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

JAKVX vs. HSGFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6	5.90%	17.29%
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund	3.87%	-12.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAKVX achieves a 5.90% return, which is significantly higher than HSGFX's 3.87% return.

JAKVX

• 1D: 1.43%
• 1M: -3.13%
• YTD: 5.90%
• 6M: 7.86%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HSGFX

• 1D: -1.83%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 3.87%
• 6M: 1.30%
• 1Y: -0.86%
• 3Y*: -1.93%
• 5Y*: -0.89%
• 10Y*: -1.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAKVX vs. HSGFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAKVX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than HSGFX's 1.15% expense ratio.

JAKVX

John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6

HSGFX

Hussman Strategic Growth Fund

Return for Risk

JAKVX vs. HSGFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HSGFX

HSGFX Risk / Return Rank: 4
HSGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
HSGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
HSGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3
HSGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
HSGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAKVX vs. HSGFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX) and Hussman Strategic Growth Fund (HSGFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JAKVX	HSGFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	3.68	0.06	+3.62

Correlation

The correlation between JAKVX and HSGFX is -0.30. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

JAKVX vs. HSGFX - Dividend Comparison

JAKVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.00%, more than HSGFX's 2.24% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6	8.00%	8.47%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HSGFX Hussman Strategic Growth Fund	2.24%	2.33%	3.00%	3.10%	1.08%	0.42%	0.16%	1.84%	1.19%	0.50%	0.28%	0.56%

Drawdowns

JAKVX vs. HSGFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAKVX drawdown since its inception was -5.16%, smaller than the maximum HSGFX drawdown of -60.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAKVX and HSGFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JAKVX	HSGFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.16%	-60.61%	+55.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-18.73%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.40%	-50.52%	+47.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.81%	-26.67%	+25.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.38%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JAKVX	HSGFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.42%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.62%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.24%	12.59%	-5.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.24%	10.95%	-3.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.24%	10.61%	-3.37%