EBUF vs. EJUL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

EBUF (Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly) and EJUL (Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. EBUF is actively managed, while EJUL is passively managed. Over the past year, EBUF returned 16.74% vs 19.31% for EJUL. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.89% expense ratio.

Performance

EBUF vs. EJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EBUF achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than EJUL's 4.86% return.

EBUF

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 1.67%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 11.55%
• 1Y: 16.74%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EJUL

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 4.86%
• 6M: 6.23%
• 1Y: 19.31%
• 3Y*: 10.33%
• 5Y*: 3.05%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EBUF vs. EJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
EBUF Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	10.10%	11.55%	2.86%
EJUL Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July	4.86%	20.20%	0.43%

Correlation

The correlation between EBUF and EJUL is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2024	0.85

The correlation between EBUF and EJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

EBUF vs. EJUL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EBUF	EJUL
Technology	36.9%	37.0%
Financial Services	19.5%	19.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	9.6%
Industrials	7.5%	7.5%
Communication Services	6.9%	6.9%
Basic Materials	6.5%	6.5%
Energy	4.1%	4.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	3.0%
Healthcare	2.9%	2.9%
Utilities	2.1%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.1%

Return for Risk

EBUF vs. EJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EBUF

EBUF Risk / Return Rank: 94
EBUF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
EBUF Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
EBUF Omega Ratio Rank: 95
EBUF Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
EBUF Martin Ratio Rank: 96

EJUL

EJUL Risk / Return Rank: 87
EJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
EJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
EJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 89
EJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
EJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EBUF vs. EJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) and Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EBUF	EJUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.03	2.66	+0.37
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	5.12	4.05	+1.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.76	1.58	+0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	9.33	5.26	+4.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	38.27	22.98	+15.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EBUF vs. EJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EBUF Sharpe Ratio is 3.03, which is comparable to the EJUL Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EBUF and EJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EBUF	EJUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.03	2.66	+0.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.96	0.27	+1.69

Drawdowns

EBUF vs. EJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EBUF drawdown since its inception was -6.49%, smaller than the maximum EJUL drawdown of -21.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EBUF and EJUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EBUF	EJUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.49%	-21.61%	+15.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.82%	-3.81%	+1.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.36%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.61%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.49%	-6.62%	+6.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.44%	0.87%	-0.43%

Volatility

EBUF vs. EJUL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly (EBUF) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July (EJUL) at 0.80%. This indicates that EBUF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EBUF	EJUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.72%	0.80%	+0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.71%	4.72%	-0.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.55%	7.32%	-1.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.66%	10.66%	-4.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.66%	11.45%	-4.79%

EBUF vs. EJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EBUF and EJUL have an expense ratio of 0.89%.

Dividends

EBUF vs. EJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither EBUF nor EJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
EBUF Innovator Emerging Markets 10 Buffer ETF - Quarterly	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EJUL Innovator Emerging Markets Power Buffer ETF - July	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EBUF and EJUL in my portfolio?

EBUF and EJUL have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EBUF or EJUL?

EBUF has higher volatility (1.72%) compared to EJUL (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EBUF dropped -6.49% vs EJUL's -21.61%.

Which ETF is better, EBUF or EJUL?

On 1-year performance, EJUL leads with 19.31% vs 16.74% for EBUF. Both ETFs have the same 0.89% expense ratio. On volatility, EJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EBUF or EJUL?

Over the 1-year period, EJUL has performed better with a 19.31% return vs 16.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EBUF or EJUL?

EBUF and EJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.89% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EBUF or EJUL?

EBUF and EJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EBUF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.