PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JAGLX vs. LYFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JAGLX vs. LYFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX) and AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund (LYFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAGLX achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than LYFIX's 12.01% return.


JAGLX

1D
-0.56%
1M
-3.52%
6M
6.37%
YTD
7.46%
1Y
36.82%
3Y*
15.24%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
11.49%
ALL TIME*
11.64%

LYFIX

1D
-0.72%
1M
-6.41%
6M
9.60%
YTD
12.01%
1Y
46.53%
3Y*
10.19%
5Y*
9.00%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JAGLX vs. LYFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JAGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T
7.46%24.72%8.50%7.41%-2.79%6.66%25.52%3.97%
LYFIX
AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund
12.01%28.22%-0.27%7.19%-0.92%-3.42%54.83%1.20%

Correlation

The correlation between JAGLX and LYFIX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2019

0.80

The correlation between JAGLX and LYFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JAGLX vs. LYFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JAGLX
JAGLX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
JAGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
JAGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

LYFIX
LYFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LYFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
LYFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JAGLX vs. LYFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX) and AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund (LYFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JAGLXLYFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.40

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.98

5.72

-1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.34

17.85

-5.50

JAGLX vs. LYFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the LYFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAGLX and LYFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JAGLX vs. LYFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAGLX drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, which is greater than LYFIX's maximum drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAGLX and LYFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JAGLXLYFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.96%

-35.33%

-23.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.71%

-8.49%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.41%

-22.78%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.25%

-30.46%

+8.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.30%

-8.48%

+4.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.34%

-9.68%

-7.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.72%

+0.40%

Volatility

JAGLX vs. LYFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX) is 4.55%, while AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund (LYFIX) has a volatility of 6.29%. This indicates that JAGLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JAGLXLYFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

6.29%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.37%

15.68%

-3.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.75%

19.79%

-4.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

22.91%

-6.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.41%

23.41%

-6.00%

JAGLX vs. LYFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAGLX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than LYFIX's 1.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

JAGLX vs. LYFIX - Dividend Comparison

JAGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than LYFIX's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T
4.21%4.53%10.98%4.22%0.14%9.78%7.75%6.17%13.38%0.89%1.13%9.09%
LYFIX
AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund
1.59%1.78%2.24%2.63%4.43%12.88%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JAGLX and LYFIX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LYFIX has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to JAGLX (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAGLX dropped -58.96% vs LYFIX's -35.33%.

LYFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JAGLX and LYFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer