PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYFIX vs. AHSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYFIX vs. AHSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund (LYFIX) and Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYFIX achieves a 2.58% return, which is significantly higher than AHSAX's 0.66% return.


LYFIX

1D
-1.87%
1M
3.29%
YTD
2.58%
6M
4.59%
1Y
37.64%
3Y*
8.02%
5Y*
5.76%
10Y*

AHSAX

1D
-1.21%
1M
1.19%
YTD
0.66%
6M
1.68%
1Y
24.53%
3Y*
3.70%
5Y*
-1.25%
10Y*
8.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYFIX vs. AHSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LYFIX
AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund
2.58%28.22%-0.27%7.19%-0.92%-3.42%54.83%1.20%
AHSAX
Alger Health Sciences Fund
0.66%10.14%1.17%-4.26%-17.04%3.26%30.99%2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between LYFIX and AHSAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2019

0.75

The correlation between LYFIX and AHSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYFIX vs. AHSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYFIX
LYFIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LYFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LYFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

AHSAX
AHSAX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
AHSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AHSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AHSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
AHSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
AHSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYFIX vs. AHSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund (LYFIX) and Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYFIXAHSAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

1.70

+0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.02

2.47

+0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.29

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.51

2.69

+1.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.66

8.46

+8.20

LYFIX vs. AHSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the AHSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYFIX and AHSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYFIXAHSAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.70

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

-0.05

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.32

+0.20

Drawdowns

LYFIX vs. AHSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYFIX drawdown since its inception was -35.33%, smaller than the maximum AHSAX drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYFIX and AHSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYFIXAHSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.33%

-46.23%

+10.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-9.67%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.22%

-23.11%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.45%

-45.04%

+12.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-26.79%

+24.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.87%

-14.70%

+4.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

3.08%

-0.78%

Volatility

LYFIX vs. AHSAX - Volatility Comparison

AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund (LYFIX) has a higher volatility of 5.84% compared to Alger Health Sciences Fund (AHSAX) at 4.64%. This indicates that LYFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AHSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYFIXAHSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.84%

4.64%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

11.57%

+2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.80%

15.00%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.83%

24.12%

-1.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.38%

23.32%

+0.06%

LYFIX vs. AHSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYFIX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than AHSAX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYFIX vs. AHSAX - Dividend Comparison

LYFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while AHSAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AHSAX
Alger Health Sciences Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%27.18%11.68%6.98%7.82%
LYFIX
AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund
1.74%1.78%2.24%2.63%4.43%12.88%2.30%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYFIX and AHSAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LYFIX has higher volatility (5.84%) compared to AHSAX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYFIX dropped -35.33% vs AHSAX's -46.23%.

LYFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYFIX and AHSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer