JAFLX vs. JGLTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (JAFLX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX).
JAFLX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 13, 1993. JGLTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jan 17, 2000.
Performance
JAFLX vs. JGLTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JAFLX vs. JGLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAFLX Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio | -0.20% | 7.41% | 1.96% | 5.52% | -13.64% | -0.89% | 10.48% | 9.57% | -1.00% | 3.62% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | -7.02% | 25.19% | 32.10% | 54.55% | -36.42% | 18.28% | 50.42% | 45.29% | 1.17% | 45.17% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAFLX achieves a -0.20% return, which is significantly higher than JGLTX's -7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, JAFLX has underperformed JGLTX with an annualized return of 2.09%, while JGLTX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.70% annualized return.
JAFLX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -1.49%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 4.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.87%
- 5Y*
- 0.35%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
JGLTX
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -6.55%
- 1Y
- 27.79%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 20.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JAFLX vs. JGLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAFLX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than JGLTX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JAFLX vs. JGLTX — Risk / Return Rank
JAFLX
JGLTX
JAFLX vs. JGLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (JAFLX) and Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JAFLX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | 1.17 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.74 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.24 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 1.81 | -0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 6.15 | -1.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JAFLX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | 1.17 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.44 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.85 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.30 | +0.74 |
Correlation
The correlation between JAFLX and JGLTX is -0.13. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
JAFLX vs. JGLTX - Dividend Comparison
JAFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, less than JGLTX's 9.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAFLX Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio | 5.35% | 5.34% | 5.09% | 4.27% | 4.75% | 4.84% | 2.87% | 3.31% | 3.21% | 2.98% | 2.92% | 2.90% |
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | 9.66% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.96% | 14.48% | 7.71% | 6.81% | 4.95% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 16.11% |
Drawdowns
JAFLX vs. JGLTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAFLX drawdown since its inception was -18.06%, smaller than the maximum JGLTX drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAFLX and JGLTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAFLX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.06% | -81.78% | +63.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.87% | -15.81% | +12.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.06% | -45.18% | +27.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.06% | -45.18% | +27.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.98% | -12.47% | +10.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.12% | -36.82% | +34.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 4.65% | -3.73% |
Volatility
JAFLX vs. JGLTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Flexible Bond Portfolio (JAFLX) is 1.60%, while Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that JAFLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JGLTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JAFLX | JGLTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.60% | 8.22% | -6.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.44% | 16.11% | -13.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23% | 25.28% | -21.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.03% | 25.93% | -19.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 24.31% | -19.39% |