PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JACSX vs. FFFCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JACSX vs. FFFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2060 Fund (JACSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JACSX achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly higher than FFFCX's 5.33% return.


JACSX

1D
0.39%
1M
5.16%
YTD
12.35%
6M
13.04%
1Y
27.93%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*

FFFCX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.88%
YTD
5.33%
6M
5.67%
1Y
12.68%
3Y*
9.08%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
5.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JACSX vs. FFFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JACSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2060 Fund
12.35%20.13%12.10%21.87%-17.61%17.49%12.82%24.42%-8.17%19.43%
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
5.33%11.39%5.26%9.82%-13.21%5.64%11.09%14.34%-3.74%12.04%

Correlation

The correlation between JACSX and FFFCX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.86

The correlation between JACSX and FFFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JACSX vs. FFFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JACSX
JACSX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JACSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JACSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
JACSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
JACSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
JACSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFCX
FFFCX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FFFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JACSX vs. FFFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2060 Fund (JACSX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JACSXFFFCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.53

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

3.20

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.03

13.95

+0.08

JACSX vs. FFFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JACSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.40, which is comparable to the FFFCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JACSX and FFFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JACSXFFFCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.40

2.59

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.58

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.68

+0.04

Drawdowns

JACSX vs. FFFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JACSX drawdown since its inception was -32.59%, smaller than the maximum FFFCX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JACSX and FFFCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JACSXFFFCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.59%

-36.88%

+4.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.03%

-4.00%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.32%

-5.83%

-9.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.29%

-18.35%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-4.57%

-0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

0.92%

+1.10%

Volatility

JACSX vs. FFFCX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2060 Fund (JACSX) has a higher volatility of 3.68% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) at 2.02%. This indicates that JACSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JACSXFFFCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

2.02%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.46%

4.15%

+5.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

4.95%

+6.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.79%

6.38%

+8.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.78%

6.30%

+9.48%

JACSX vs. FFFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JACSX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFCX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

JACSX vs. FFFCX - Dividend Comparison

JACSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.99%, less than FFFCX's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFCX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund
4.66%4.97%2.99%2.72%7.23%9.33%6.01%5.78%6.98%4.82%3.22%3.68%
JACSX
JPMorgan SmartRetirement Blend 2060 Fund
1.99%2.23%2.00%1.72%1.73%4.37%1.21%2.03%3.16%2.05%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JACSX and FFFCX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JACSX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to FFFCX (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JACSX dropped -32.59% vs FFFCX's -36.88%.

FFFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JACSX and FFFCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer