JACAX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio (JACAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
JACAX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on May 1, 1997. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
JACAX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JACAX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JACAX Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio | -15.92% | 18.31% | 28.47% | 39.96% | -33.20% | 23.08% | 38.78% | 37.19% | 1.94% | -1.05% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 38.43% | 36.30% | -1.59% | -0.60% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JACAX achieves a -15.92% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
JACAX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- -15.92%
- 6M
- -15.78%
- 1Y
- 9.01%
- 3Y*
- 16.16%
- 5Y*
- 7.64%
- 10Y*
- 14.54%
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JACAX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JACAX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JACAX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
JACAX
SWLGX
JACAX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio (JACAX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JACAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 0.66 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.69 | 1.10 | -0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.15 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.28 | 0.72 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.96 | 2.51 | -1.55 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JACAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 0.66 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.56 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.68 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between JACAX and SWLGX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JACAX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
JACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.77%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JACAX Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio | 14.77% | 12.42% | 5.57% | 0.17% | 21.09% | 12.14% | 6.42% | 7.80% | 16.87% | 5.10% | 14.93% | 23.91% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
JACAX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JACAX drawdown since its inception was -57.74%, which is greater than SWLGX's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JACAX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JACAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.74% | -32.69% | -25.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.05% | -16.16% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.60% | -32.69% | -7.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.05% | -16.16% | -2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.84% | -7.13% | -9.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.51% | 4.62% | +0.89% |
Volatility
JACAX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio (JACAX) has a higher volatility of 6.11% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) at 5.38%. This indicates that JACAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JACAX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 5.38% | +0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.97% | 11.82% | +1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.49% | 22.31% | +0.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 21.47% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 22.78% | -1.36% |