JACAX vs. JNGTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio (JACAX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX).
JACAX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on May 1, 1997. JNGTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 31, 1998.
Performance
JACAX vs. JNGTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JACAX vs. JNGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JACAX Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio | -12.22% | 18.31% | 28.47% | 39.96% | -33.20% | 23.08% | 38.78% | 37.19% | 1.94% | 30.39% |
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | -7.02% | 25.00% | 32.34% | 55.33% | -37.63% | 17.53% | 51.18% | 45.15% | 0.92% | 44.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JACAX achieves a -12.22% return, which is significantly lower than JNGTX's -7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, JACAX has underperformed JNGTX with an annualized return of 15.04%, while JNGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.41% annualized return.
JACAX
- 1D
- 4.40%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- -12.22%
- 6M
- -12.54%
- 1Y
- 13.04%
- 3Y*
- 17.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.16%
- 10Y*
- 15.04%
JNGTX
- 1D
- 4.03%
- 1M
- -7.48%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -6.55%
- 1Y
- 27.77%
- 3Y*
- 24.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.78%
- 10Y*
- 20.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JACAX vs. JNGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JACAX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than JNGTX's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JACAX vs. JNGTX — Risk / Return Rank
JACAX
JNGTX
JACAX vs. JNGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio (JACAX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JACAX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.16 | -0.55 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 1.73 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.24 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 1.80 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.33 | 6.10 | -3.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JACAX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.16 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.41 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.84 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.44 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between JACAX and JNGTX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JACAX vs. JNGTX - Dividend Comparison
JACAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.15%, less than JNGTX's 14.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JACAX Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio | 14.15% | 12.42% | 5.57% | 0.17% | 21.09% | 12.14% | 6.42% | 7.80% | 16.87% | 5.10% | 14.93% | 23.91% |
JNGTX Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D | 14.43% | 13.42% | 11.65% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 15.86% | 8.99% | 8.55% | 6.61% | 7.47% | 4.83% | 7.75% |
Drawdowns
JACAX vs. JNGTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JACAX drawdown since its inception was -57.74%, smaller than the maximum JNGTX drawdown of -84.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JACAX and JNGTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JACAX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.74% | -84.79% | +27.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.05% | -15.93% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.60% | -46.46% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.60% | -46.46% | +5.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.49% | -12.54% | -2.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.84% | -40.47% | +23.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.59% | 4.69% | +0.90% |
Volatility
JACAX vs. JNGTX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Forty Portfolio (JACAX) is 7.72%, while Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class D (JNGTX) has a volatility of 8.32%. This indicates that JACAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JACAX | JNGTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.72% | 8.32% | -0.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.69% | 16.27% | -2.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.86% | 25.51% | -2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.97% | 26.29% | -4.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.46% | 24.40% | -2.94% |