PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JABVX vs. YFSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JABVX vs. YFSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Global Environmental Opportunities Fund (JABVX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JABVX achieves a 17.82% return, which is significantly lower than YFSNX's 24.04% return.


JABVX

1D
1.87%
1M
4.86%
YTD
17.82%
6M
17.45%
1Y
20.50%
3Y*
10.91%
5Y*
10Y*

YFSNX

1D
0.30%
1M
0.70%
YTD
24.04%
6M
26.79%
1Y
23.43%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
8.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JABVX vs. YFSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
JABVX
John Hancock Global Environmental Opportunities Fund
17.82%6.57%3.45%19.30%-23.71%10.90%
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
24.04%14.79%-0.47%16.48%-9.39%2.54%

Correlation

The correlation between JABVX and YFSNX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2021

0.65

The correlation between JABVX and YFSNX shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JABVX vs. YFSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JABVX
JABVX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
JABVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JABVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
JABVX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
JABVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
JABVX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

YFSNX
YFSNX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
YFSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YFSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
YFSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
YFSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
YFSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JABVX vs. YFSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Global Environmental Opportunities Fund (JABVX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JABVXYFSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.27

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.69

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.21

5.24

-0.03

JABVX vs. YFSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JABVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is comparable to the YFSNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JABVX and YFSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JABVX vs. YFSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JABVX drawdown since its inception was -33.96%, roughly equal to the maximum YFSNX drawdown of -35.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABVX and YFSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JABVXYFSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.96%

-35.14%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-14.09%

+2.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.08%

-14.29%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.19%

+3.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.37%

-4.93%

-5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.78%

4.50%

-0.72%

Volatility

JABVX vs. YFSNX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Global Environmental Opportunities Fund (JABVX) has a higher volatility of 6.99% compared to AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N (YFSNX) at 6.52%. This indicates that JABVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than YFSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JABVXYFSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.99%

6.52%

+0.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

21.26%

-6.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.41%

21.73%

-4.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.30%

15.52%

+3.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.30%

16.29%

+3.01%

JABVX vs. YFSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JABVX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than YFSNX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

JABVX vs. YFSNX - Dividend Comparison

JABVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.16%, while YFSNX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JABVX
John Hancock Global Environmental Opportunities Fund
6.16%7.26%6.63%0.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
YFSNX
AMG Yacktman Global Fund Class N
0.00%0.00%8.40%7.86%4.33%8.06%4.71%6.59%0.71%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


JABVX and YFSNX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JABVX has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to YFSNX (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JABVX dropped -33.96% vs YFSNX's -35.14%.

JABVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JABVX and YFSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer