PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JABS vs. ZTWO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JABS vs. ZTWO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JABS achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than ZTWO's 0.93% return.


JABS

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.39%
YTD
1.27%
6M
1.81%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ZTWO

1D
0.04%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.93%
6M
1.30%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JABS vs. ZTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JABS and ZTWO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JABS vs. ZTWO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JABS

ZTWO
ZTWO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
ZTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ZTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JABS vs. ZTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JABS vs. ZTWO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JABSZTWODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.21

3.17

-0.96

Drawdowns

JABS vs. ZTWO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JABS drawdown since its inception was -0.97%, roughly equal to the maximum ZTWO drawdown of -0.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABS and ZTWO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JABSZTWODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.97%

-0.93%

-0.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-0.07%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.18%

-0.10%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.20%

Volatility

JABS vs. ZTWO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JABSZTWODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.00%

1.31%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.00%

1.49%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.00%

1.49%

+0.51%

JABS vs. ZTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JABS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTWO's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

JABS vs. ZTWO - Dividend Comparison

JABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than ZTWO's 4.12% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


JABS and ZTWO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ZTWO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ZTWO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for JABS.

JABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 4.12% for ZTWO.

They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for JABS and 0.15% for ZTWO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JABS and ZTWO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer