JABS vs. ZTWO
JABS (Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF) and ZTWO (F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both Short-Term Bond funds. JABS is actively managed, while ZTWO is passively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JABS charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ZTWO.
Performance
JABS vs. ZTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JABS achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than ZTWO's 0.93% return.
JABS
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.39%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.81%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZTWO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 1.30%
- 1Y
- 3.94%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JABS vs. ZTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JABS Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 1.27% | 2.49% |
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.93% | 2.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between JABS and ZTWO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JABS vs. ZTWO — Risk / Return Rank
JABS
ZTWO
JABS vs. ZTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF (JABS) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JABS | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.21 | 3.17 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
JABS vs. ZTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JABS drawdown since its inception was -0.97%, roughly equal to the maximum ZTWO drawdown of -0.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABS and ZTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JABS | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.97% | -0.93% | -0.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.07% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.18% | -0.10% | -0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.20% | — |
Volatility
JABS vs. ZTWO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JABS | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.42% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.97% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00% | 1.31% | +0.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.00% | 1.49% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.00% | 1.49% | +0.51% |
JABS vs. ZTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
JABS has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTWO's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
JABS vs. ZTWO - Dividend Comparison
JABS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, more than ZTWO's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
JABS Janus Henderson Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 4.19% | 2.19% | 0.00% |
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.31% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JABS and ZTWO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZTWO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZTWO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for JABS.
JABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.19%, compared with 4.12% for ZTWO.
They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for JABS and 0.15% for ZTWO.
Find the right allocation for JABS and ZTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer