JABLX vs. JNGLX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JABLX (Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio) and JNGLX (Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund) are both mutual funds - JABLX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Janus Henderson, while JNGLX is a Health & Biotech Equities fund managed by Janus Henderson. Over the past 10 years, JABLX returned 10.50%/yr vs 10.41%/yr for JNGLX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JABLX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for JNGLX.

Performance

JABLX vs. JNGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JABLX achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly higher than JNGLX's -2.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JABLX having a 10.50% annualized return and JNGLX not far behind at 10.41%.

JABLX

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 2.16%
• YTD: 3.38%
• 6M: 3.50%
• 1Y: 14.17%
• 3Y*: 13.91%
• 5Y*: 7.88%
• 10Y*: 10.50%

JNGLX

• 1D: 1.13%
• 1M: -0.29%
• YTD: -2.51%
• 6M: -0.73%
• 1Y: 26.17%
• 3Y*: 9.73%
• 5Y*: 7.15%
• 10Y*: 10.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JABLX vs. JNGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JABLX Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio	3.38%	15.13%	15.42%	15.41%	-16.36%	17.20%	14.21%	22.60%	0.68%	18.44%
JNGLX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund	-2.51%	24.84%	3.60%	7.51%	-2.69%	6.78%	25.66%	29.20%	4.17%	22.13%

Correlation

The correlation between JABLX and JNGLX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 1999	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between JABLX and JNGLX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

JABLX vs. JNGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JABLX

JABLX Risk / Return Rank: 33
JABLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
JABLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
JABLX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
JABLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
JABLX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

JNGLX

JNGLX Risk / Return Rank: 41
JNGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
JNGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
JNGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
JNGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
JNGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JABLX vs. JNGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JABLX	JNGLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	1.79	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	2.62	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.31	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	2.75	-0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.85	8.75	-0.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JABLX vs. JNGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JABLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the JNGLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JABLX and JNGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JABLX	JNGLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.69	1.79	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.45	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95	0.60	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.93	0.57	+0.36

Drawdowns

JABLX vs. JNGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JABLX drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum JNGLX drawdown of -59.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABLX and JNGLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JABLX	JNGLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.07%	-59.00%	+31.93%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.10%	-9.68%	+1.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.89%	-21.17%	+9.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.30%	-22.21%	+0.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.47%	-27.37%	+4.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.55%	-5.44%	+4.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.71%	-17.65%	+12.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.87%	3.04%	-1.17%

Volatility

JABLX vs. JNGLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) is 2.52%, while Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that JABLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JABLX	JNGLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.52%	4.80%	-2.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.93%	10.89%	-3.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.74%	14.86%	-6.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.16%	15.86%	-4.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.11%	17.38%	-6.27%

JABLX vs. JNGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JABLX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than JNGLX's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

JABLX vs. JNGLX - Dividend Comparison

JABLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.99%, more than JNGLX's 4.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JABLX Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio	4.99%	5.16%	2.02%	2.01%	4.78%	1.58%	3.14%	4.43%	5.22%	1.71%	3.64%	5.22%
JNGLX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund	4.68%	4.56%	5.84%	4.26%	0.25%	9.85%	7.80%	6.23%	13.32%	0.89%	0.30%	8.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JABLX and JNGLX in my portfolio?

JABLX and JNGLX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JABLX or JNGLX?

JNGLX has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to JABLX (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JABLX dropped -27.07% vs JNGLX's -59.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JNGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.