JABLX vs. JNGLX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX).
JABLX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Sep 12, 1993. JNGLX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Dec 30, 1998.
Performance
JABLX vs. JNGLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JABLX vs. JNGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JABLX Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio | -4.89% | 15.13% | 15.42% | 15.41% | -16.36% | 17.20% | 14.21% | 22.60% | 0.68% | 18.44% |
JNGLX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund | -3.73% | 24.84% | 3.60% | 7.51% | -2.69% | 6.78% | 25.66% | 29.20% | 4.17% | 22.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JABLX achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly lower than JNGLX's -3.73% return. Over the past 10 years, JABLX has underperformed JNGLX with an annualized return of 9.63%, while JNGLX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.02% annualized return.
JABLX
- 1D
- 2.07%
- 1M
- -4.41%
- YTD
- -4.89%
- 6M
- -3.63%
- 1Y
- 11.29%
- 3Y*
- 11.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
JNGLX
- 1D
- 3.08%
- 1M
- -5.55%
- YTD
- -3.73%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- 1Y
- 21.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 7.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JABLX vs. JNGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JABLX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than JNGLX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JABLX vs. JNGLX — Risk / Return Rank
JABLX
JNGLX
JABLX vs. JNGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JABLX | JNGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 1.07 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 1.54 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.20 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.80 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.93 | 4.97 | +0.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JABLX | JNGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.07 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.47 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.63 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.57 | +0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between JABLX and JNGLX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JABLX vs. JNGLX - Dividend Comparison
JABLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, more than JNGLX's 4.74% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JABLX Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio | 5.42% | 5.16% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 4.78% | 1.58% | 3.14% | 4.43% | 5.22% | 1.71% | 3.64% | 5.22% |
JNGLX Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund | 4.74% | 4.56% | 5.84% | 4.26% | 0.25% | 9.85% | 7.80% | 6.23% | 13.32% | 0.89% | 0.30% | 8.81% |
Drawdowns
JABLX vs. JNGLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JABLX drawdown since its inception was -27.07%, smaller than the maximum JNGLX drawdown of -59.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABLX and JNGLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JABLX | JNGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.07% | -59.00% | +31.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.10% | -9.68% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.30% | -22.21% | +0.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.47% | -27.37% | +4.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.20% | -6.62% | +0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.73% | -17.73% | +13.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 3.61% | -1.58% |
Volatility
JABLX vs. JNGLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Balanced Portfolio (JABLX) is 4.07%, while Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund (JNGLX) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that JABLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JABLX | JNGLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.07% | 5.98% | -1.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.80% | 10.63% | -3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.16% | 17.86% | -5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.14% | 15.69% | -4.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.08% | 17.42% | -6.34% |