PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JABAX vs. FSRRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JABAX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T (JABAX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JABAX achieves a 3.89% return, which is significantly lower than FSRRX's 8.69% return. Over the past 10 years, JABAX has outperformed FSRRX with an annualized return of 10.83%, while FSRRX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.64% annualized return.


JABAX

1D
0.00%
1M
3.15%
YTD
3.89%
6M
3.89%
1Y
15.08%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
8.93%
10Y*
10.83%

FSRRX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.10%
YTD
8.69%
6M
9.04%
1Y
16.60%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
5.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JABAX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JABAX
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T
3.89%14.85%20.63%15.29%-16.70%17.07%14.22%22.40%0.53%17.68%
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
8.69%10.45%5.84%4.59%-3.34%15.84%3.74%10.48%-3.99%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between JABAX and FSRRX is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2005

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between JABAX and FSRRX has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JABAX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JABAX
JABAX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
JABAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JABAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
JABAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
JABAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JABAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

FSRRX
FSRRX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FSRRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSRRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSRRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FSRRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSRRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JABAX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T (JABAX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JABAXFSRRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.71

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

8.14

-6.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.25

32.01

-23.76

JABAX vs. FSRRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JABAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the FSRRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JABAX and FSRRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JABAXFSRRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

3.55

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.93

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.84

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.96

0.59

+0.37

Drawdowns

JABAX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JABAX drawdown since its inception was -25.98%, smaller than the maximum FSRRX drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JABAX and FSRRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JABAXFSRRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.98%

-33.42%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.14%

-2.05%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.93%

-5.80%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.60%

-12.78%

-8.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.50%

-19.93%

-2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.72%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.15%

-4.21%

+0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.88%

0.52%

+1.36%

Volatility

JABAX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T (JABAX) has a higher volatility of 2.46% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) at 1.30%. This indicates that JABAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JABAXFSRRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.46%

1.30%

+1.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.92%

3.68%

+3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.71%

4.71%

+4.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.34%

6.88%

+4.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.23%

6.73%

+4.50%

JABAX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JABAX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

JABAX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison

JABAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, more than FSRRX's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSRRX
Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund
4.13%4.68%4.82%5.29%7.31%5.35%2.25%3.05%9.39%1.57%2.34%1.75%
JABAX
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class T
8.39%8.67%11.71%2.15%1.83%4.38%2.41%2.76%6.95%4.59%3.28%6.18%

Frequently Asked Questions


JABAX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JABAX has higher volatility (2.46%) compared to FSRRX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JABAX dropped -25.98% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.

FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JABAX and FSRRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer