JAAAX vs. MU
JAAAX (John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund) is Multistrategy fund managed by John Hancock, while MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, JAAAX returned 4.13%/yr vs 54.16%/yr for MU. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
JAAAX vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAAAX achieves a 5.83% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 240.34% return. Over the past 10 years, JAAAX has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 4.13%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 54.16% annualized return.
JAAAX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- 5.83%
- 1Y
- 9.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.30%
- 10Y*
- 4.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.49%
MU
- 1D
- 12.17%
- 1M
- -14.38%
- 6M
- 166.13%
- YTD
- 240.34%
- 1Y
- 758.76%
- 3Y*
- 146.36%
- 5Y*
- 67.49%
- 10Y*
- 54.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 17.59%
JAAAX vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAAAX John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund | 5.83% | 6.18% | 6.59% | 5.85% | -3.12% | 4.77% | 4.36% | 8.95% | -4.09% | 6.10% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 240.34% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAAAX and MU is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2008 | 0.50 |
The correlation between JAAAX and MU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.42 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAAAX vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
JAAAX
MU
JAAAX vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JAAAX | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.70 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 25.31 | -20.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.55 | 84.73 | -68.17 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JAAAX vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAAAX drawdown since its inception was -15.72%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAAAX and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAAAX | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -98.25% | +82.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.02% | -30.28% | +28.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.66% | -57.63% | +51.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.28% | -57.63% | +51.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -12.64% | -57.63% | +44.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -19.99% | +19.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.04% | -58.05% | +56.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.57% | 9.03% | -8.46% |
Volatility
JAAAX vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund (JAAAX) is 0.89%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 32.09%. This indicates that JAAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAAAX | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.89% | 32.09% | -31.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.62% | 63.69% | -61.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46% | 77.22% | -73.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.20% | 55.26% | -51.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.37% | 50.92% | -46.55% |
Dividends
JAAAX vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
JAAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAAAX John Hancock Funds Alternative Asset Allocation Fund | 1.44% | 1.53% | 1.17% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 1.72% | 0.74% | 3.38% | 1.99% | 1.23% | 0.77% | 2.78% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JAAAX and MU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (32.09%) compared to JAAAX (0.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAAAX dropped -15.72% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.93 vs 2.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JAAAX and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer