IYZ vs. XLB
IYZ (iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF) and XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYZ is a Communications Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index, while XLB is a Materials fund tracking the Materials Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYZ returned 5.94%/yr vs 10.54%/yr for XLB. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYZ charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLB.
Performance
IYZ vs. XLB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYZ achieves a 29.57% return, which is significantly higher than XLB's 15.57% return. Over the past 10 years, IYZ has underperformed XLB with an annualized return of 5.94%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively higher 10.54% annualized return.
IYZ
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- YTD
- 29.57%
- 6M
- 32.60%
- 1Y
- 56.05%
- 3Y*
- 28.37%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- 5.94%
XLB
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 15.57%
- 6M
- 16.68%
- 1Y
- 20.35%
- 3Y*
- 10.88%
- 5Y*
- 6.01%
- 10Y*
- 10.54%
IYZ vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYZ iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF | 29.57% | 29.28% | 20.53% | 3.90% | -30.29% | 11.69% | 4.13% | 16.14% | -8.59% | -11.86% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 15.57% | 9.94% | 0.15% | 12.46% | -12.30% | 27.44% | 20.46% | 24.13% | -14.88% | 24.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYZ and XLB is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2000 | 0.59 |
The correlation between IYZ and XLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (1 year) to 0.61 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYZ vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank
IYZ
XLB
IYZ vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYZ | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.85 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.20 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.54 | 1.65 | +4.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.99 | 5.05 | +20.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYZ vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYZ drawdown since its inception was -77.11%, which is greater than XLB's maximum drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYZ and XLB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYZ | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.11% | -59.83% | -17.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.62% | -12.38% | +3.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.85% | -23.17% | +9.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.74% | -24.72% | -15.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.74% | -37.27% | -2.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.77% | -2.25% | -2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -40.10% | -10.83% | -29.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 4.04% | -1.87% |
Volatility
IYZ vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF (IYZ) has a higher volatility of 8.76% compared to Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) at 7.05%. This indicates that IYZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYZ | XLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.76% | 7.05% | +1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.61% | 13.58% | +2.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 17.49% | +1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 19.06% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 20.70% | -1.40% |
IYZ vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYZ has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYZ vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison
IYZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%, less than XLB's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYZ iShares U.S. Telecommunications ETF | 1.53% | 2.04% | 1.94% | 2.27% | 2.55% | 2.51% | 2.60% | 2.36% | 2.15% | 3.54% | 2.27% | 1.98% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.68% | 1.92% | 1.92% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYZ and XLB have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYZ has higher volatility (8.76%) compared to XLB (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYZ dropped -77.11% vs XLB's -59.83%.
On 10-year performance, XLB leads with 10.54% vs 5.94% for IYZ. On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, XLB has been the lower-risk option at 7.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLB has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 5.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYZ.
XLB has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 1.53% for IYZ.
IYZ is categorized as Communications Equities, while XLB is Materials. IYZ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index, while XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYZ and 0.13% for XLB.
IYZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYZ and XLB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer