PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYW vs. KROP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYW vs. KROP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYW achieves a 28.46% return, which is significantly higher than KROP's 16.59% return.


IYW

1D
-0.44%
1M
13.87%
YTD
28.46%
6M
27.22%
1Y
58.25%
3Y*
35.17%
5Y*
22.76%
10Y*
26.00%

KROP

1D
0.22%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
16.59%
6M
14.86%
1Y
12.86%
3Y*
0.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYW vs. KROP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
28.46%25.38%30.25%65.44%-34.83%12.87%
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
16.59%7.95%-8.74%-23.86%-27.23%-18.75%

Correlation

The correlation between IYW and KROP is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between IYW and KROP has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYW vs. KROP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYW
IYW Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYW Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
IYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

KROP
KROP Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
KROP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KROP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
KROP Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
KROP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
KROP Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYW vs. KROP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) and Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IYWKROPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.15

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

1.14

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.76

2.58

+8.18

IYW vs. KROP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYW Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is higher than the KROP Sharpe Ratio of 0.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYW and KROP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IYWKROPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

0.81

+2.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

-0.57

+0.92

Drawdowns

IYW vs. KROP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYW drawdown since its inception was -81.90%, which is greater than KROP's maximum drawdown of -61.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYW and KROP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYWKROPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.90%

-61.96%

-19.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.81%

-11.29%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.47%

-28.70%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.35%

-48.93%

+47.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.65%

-44.50%

+9.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.43%

4.99%

+0.44%

Volatility

IYW vs. KROP - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Technology ETF (IYW) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) at 4.69%. This indicates that IYW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KROP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYWKROPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

4.69%

+1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.84%

11.98%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

16.04%

+4.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.86%

22.27%

+3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.09%

22.27%

+2.82%

IYW vs. KROP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYW has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than KROP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYW vs. KROP - Dividend Comparison

IYW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than KROP's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYW
iShares U.S. Technology ETF
0.11%0.14%0.21%0.34%0.50%0.31%0.56%0.72%0.92%0.82%1.14%1.12%
KROP
Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF
2.34%2.73%1.89%1.36%0.71%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYW and KROP have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYW has higher volatility (6.28%) compared to KROP (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYW dropped -81.90% vs KROP's -61.96%.

On 3-year performance, IYW leads with 35.17% vs 0.72% for KROP. On fees, IYW is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IYW has performed better with a 35.17% return vs 0.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYW is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.

KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.34%, compared with 0.11% for IYW.

IYW tracks Russell 1000 Technology RIC 22.5/45 Capped Index, while KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYW and 0.50% for KROP.

IYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYW and KROP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer