PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYT vs. PRN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYT vs. PRN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYT achieves a 14.55% return, which is significantly lower than PRN's 23.45% return. Over the past 10 years, IYT has underperformed PRN with an annualized return of 10.75%, while PRN has yielded a comparatively higher 16.36% annualized return.


IYT

1D
0.01%
1M
-3.52%
6M
11.47%
YTD
14.55%
1Y
28.75%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
7.51%
10Y*
10.75%
ALL TIME*
9.92%

PRN

1D
1.01%
1M
-8.35%
6M
11.82%
YTD
23.45%
1Y
34.52%
3Y*
25.97%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
16.36%
ALL TIME*
12.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$61.92M$57.48M$60.22M
$11.92M$11.20M$10.20M

IYT vs. PRN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYT
iShares Transportation Average ETF
14.55%11.48%4.10%24.62%-21.74%26.41%14.20%20.11%-12.87%18.89%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
23.45%13.74%30.35%37.96%-25.09%25.21%36.39%34.52%-16.19%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between IYT and PRN is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006

0.76

Over the past year, the correlation between IYT and PRN has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.76, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IYT vs. PRN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IYT
PRN

Industrials

84.9%
73.1%

Technology

15.1%
21.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.4%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

1.6%

Financial Services

-

1.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

IYT
84.9%
PRN
73.1%

Technology

IYT
15.1%
PRN
21.9%

Basic Materials

IYT

-

PRN
1.4%

Communication Services

IYT

-

PRN

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYT

-

PRN
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

IYT

-

PRN

-

Energy

IYT

-

PRN
1.6%

Financial Services

IYT

-

PRN
1.2%

Healthcare

IYT

-

PRN

-

Real Estate

IYT

-

PRN
2.3%

Utilities

IYT

-

PRN

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYT vs. PRN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

IYT
IYT Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYT Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYT Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

PRN
PRN Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
PRN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRN Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
PRN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRN Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

IYT vs. PRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) and Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYTPRNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.18

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

1.28

+0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.44

5.15

+2.29

IYT vs. PRN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYT Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is higher than the PRN Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYT and PRN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYT vs. PRN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYT drawdown since its inception was -60.39%, roughly equal to the maximum PRN drawdown of -59.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYT and PRN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYTPRNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.39%

-59.88%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.09%

-24.60%

+12.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.35%

-30.78%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

-34.84%

+5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.28%

-36.27%

-5.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.69%

-17.94%

+12.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.26%

-10.82%

+1.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.53%

6.13%

-2.60%

Volatility

IYT vs. PRN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Transportation Average ETF (IYT) is 4.43%, while Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) has a volatility of 15.11%. This indicates that IYT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYTPRNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

15.11%

-10.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.10%

28.53%

-12.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.29%

34.23%

-13.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.33%

26.30%

-3.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.11%

24.88%

-1.77%

IYT vs. PRN - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYT has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than PRN's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYT vs. PRN - Dividend Comparison

IYT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, more than PRN's 0.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IYT
iShares Transportation Average ETF
0.92%1.00%1.08%1.26%1.40%0.77%0.93%1.29%1.35%0.92%0.96%1.28%
PRN
Invesco DWA Industrials Momentum ETF
0.10%0.17%0.39%0.52%0.82%0.11%0.10%0.42%0.29%0.60%0.57%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYT and PRN have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PRN has higher volatility (15.11%) compared to IYT (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYT dropped -60.39% vs PRN's -59.88%.

On 10-year performance, PRN leads with 16.36% vs 10.75% for IYT. On fees, IYT is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IYT has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PRN has performed better with a 16.36% return vs 10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYT is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PRN.

IYT has the higher dividend yield at 0.92%, compared with 0.10% for PRN.

IYT is categorized as Industrials Equities, while PRN is Momentum. IYT tracks Dow Jones Transportation Average Index, while PRN tracks DWA Industrials Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYT and 0.60% for PRN.

IYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.29 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYT and PRN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer