IYRI vs. BITY
IYRI (NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF) and BITY (Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, IYRI returned 10.44% vs -43.55% for BITY. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IYRI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BITY.
Performance
IYRI vs. BITY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYRI achieves a 7.81% return, which is significantly higher than BITY's -24.19% return.
IYRI
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 7.81%
- 1Y
- 10.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITY
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- 6M
- -31.88%
- YTD
- -24.19%
- 1Y
- -43.55%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYRI vs. BITY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 7.81% | 6.47% |
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | -24.19% | -7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYRI and BITY is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYRI vs. BITY — Risk / Return Rank
IYRI
BITY
IYRI vs. BITY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) and Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYRI | BITY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.83 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | -0.86 | +2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.99 | -1.41 | +6.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYRI vs. BITY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYRI drawdown since its inception was -12.12%, smaller than the maximum BITY drawdown of -50.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYRI and BITY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYRI | BITY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.12% | -50.87% | +38.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -50.87% | +43.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.68% | -46.26% | +45.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -22.21% | +20.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 30.92% | -28.82% |
Volatility
IYRI vs. BITY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF (IYRI) is 3.76%, while Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF (BITY) has a volatility of 11.61%. This indicates that IYRI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYRI | BITY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.76% | 11.61% | -7.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.12% | 32.62% | -24.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.87% | 41.49% | -30.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.11% | 39.43% | -26.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.11% | 39.43% | -26.32% |
IYRI vs. BITY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYRI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BITY's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYRI vs. BITY - Dividend Comparison
IYRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.94%, less than BITY's 38.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BITY Amplify Bitcoin 2% Monthly Option Income ETF | 38.61% | 21.53% |
IYRI NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF | 10.94% | 11.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYRI and BITY have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BITY has higher volatility (11.61%) compared to IYRI (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYRI dropped -12.12% vs BITY's -50.87%.
On 1-year performance, IYRI leads with 10.44% vs -43.55% for BITY. On fees, BITY is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, IYRI has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IYRI has performed better with a 10.44% return vs -43.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BITY is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for IYRI.
BITY has the higher dividend yield at 38.61%, compared with 10.94% for IYRI.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for IYRI and 0.65% for BITY.
IYRI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.97 vs -1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYRI and BITY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer