PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IYM vs. EART
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IYM vs. EART - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) and Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYM achieves a 18.70% return, which is significantly higher than EART's 6.12% return.


IYM

1D
1.41%
1M
-1.64%
YTD
18.70%
6M
16.58%
1Y
33.83%
3Y*
13.80%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
11.48%

EART

1D
0.45%
1M
-10.27%
YTD
6.12%
6M
4.87%
1Y
83.94%
3Y*
18.94%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYM vs. EART - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IYM
iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF
18.70%20.41%-4.54%12.83%-2.65%
EART
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
6.12%98.48%-7.19%-19.75%-17.92%

Correlation

The correlation between IYM and EART is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022

0.68

The correlation between IYM and EART has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IYM vs. EART — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IYM
IYM Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
IYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYM Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
IYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYM Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

EART
EART Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
EART Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EART Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
EART Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
EART Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EART Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYM vs. EART - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) and Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IYMEARTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.33

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.50

3.24

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

9.20

+0.10

IYM vs. EART - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYM Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the EART Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYM and EART, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYM vs. EART - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYM drawdown since its inception was -67.78%, which is greater than EART's maximum drawdown of -53.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYM and EART.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IYMEARTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.78%

-53.68%

-14.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.61%

-26.03%

+12.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.62%

-37.20%

+13.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.83%

-19.61%

+15.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

-28.97%

+17.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.65%

9.15%

-5.50%

Volatility

IYM vs. EART - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) is 7.35%, while Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF (EART) has a volatility of 13.04%. This indicates that IYM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EART based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IYMEARTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.35%

13.04%

-5.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.91%

33.41%

-17.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.74%

39.55%

-19.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.52%

34.25%

-13.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

34.25%

-12.52%

IYM vs. EART - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYM has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than EART's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

IYM vs. EART - Dividend Comparison

IYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%, more than EART's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EART
Global X Rare Earth & Critical Materials ETF
0.61%0.65%1.06%1.83%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IYM
iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF
1.28%1.51%1.65%1.77%2.14%1.48%1.39%2.08%1.68%1.43%1.47%2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


IYM and EART have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EART has higher volatility (13.04%) compared to IYM (7.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYM dropped -67.78% vs EART's -53.68%.

On 3-year performance, EART leads with 18.94% vs 13.80% for IYM. On fees, IYM is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IYM has been the lower-risk option at 7.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, EART has performed better with a 18.94% return vs 13.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IYM is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EART.

IYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.61% for EART.

IYM is categorized as Materials, while EART is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. IYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index, while EART tracks Solactive Rare Earth & Critical Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYM and 0.59% for EART.

EART currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYM and EART

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer