IYK vs. XRT
IYK (iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF) and XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYK is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index, while XRT is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P Retail Select Industry. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYK returned 9.43%/yr vs 9.25%/yr for XRT. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYK charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XRT.
Performance
IYK vs. XRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYK achieves a 9.34% return, which is significantly higher than XRT's 1.06% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IYK having a 9.43% annualized return and XRT not far behind at 9.25%.
IYK
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 9.34%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- 5.42%
- 3Y*
- 5.69%
- 5Y*
- 6.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.43%
XRT
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 4.15%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- -0.21%
- 1Y
- 12.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.88%
- 5Y*
- -0.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.25%
IYK vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 9.34% | 4.78% | 5.27% | -2.84% | 3.57% | 17.32% | 32.65% | 28.12% | -13.84% | 16.53% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 1.06% | 8.07% | 11.78% | 21.53% | -31.64% | 42.60% | 41.91% | 14.12% | -8.04% | 4.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYK and XRT is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IYK and XRT has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IYK vs. XRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYK
XRT
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
IYK
XRT
Healthcare
IYK
XRT
Basic Materials
IYK
XRT
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYK
XRT
Industrials
IYK
XRT
-
Communication Services
IYK
-
XRT
Energy
IYK
-
XRT
Financial Services
IYK
-
XRT
-
Real Estate
IYK
-
XRT
-
Technology
IYK
-
XRT
Utilities
IYK
-
XRT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYK vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank
IYK
XRT
IYK vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYK | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.11 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 0.89 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.04 | 2.02 | -0.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYK vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYK drawdown since its inception was -42.64%, smaller than the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYK and XRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYK | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.64% | -65.81% | +23.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -13.53% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.14% | -25.62% | +13.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.05% | -44.57% | +29.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.19% | -47.02% | +13.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.76% | -11.14% | +5.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -14.99% | +9.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.21% | 5.97% | -0.76% |
Volatility
IYK vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) is 5.45%, while SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a volatility of 6.36%. This indicates that IYK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYK | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.45% | 6.36% | -0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.06% | 14.34% | -4.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.80% | 20.60% | -7.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.09% | 26.93% | -13.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 27.19% | -11.66% |
IYK vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYK has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYK vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison
IYK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than XRT's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 2.62% | 2.75% | 2.63% | 2.74% | 2.16% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 2.21% | 2.81% | 1.74% | 2.63% | 2.11% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 0.79% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYK and XRT have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XRT has higher volatility (6.36%) compared to IYK (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYK dropped -42.64% vs XRT's -65.81%.
On 10-year performance, IYK leads with 9.43% vs 9.25% for XRT. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IYK has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYK has performed better with a 9.43% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYK.
IYK has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 0.79% for XRT.
IYK is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while XRT is Consumer Discretionary Equities. IYK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index, while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYK and 0.35% for XRT.
XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.59 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYK and XRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer