IYK vs. IAU
IYK (iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF) and IAU (iShares Gold Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - IYK is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index, while IAU is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYK returned 8.83%/yr vs 13.38%/yr for IAU. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IYK charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IAU.
Performance
IYK vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYK achieves a 5.46% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 3.83% return. Over the past 10 years, IYK has underperformed IAU with an annualized return of 8.83%, while IAU has yielded a comparatively higher 13.38% annualized return.
IYK
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 5.46%
- 6M
- 5.91%
- 1Y
- 1.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.78%
- 5Y*
- 5.51%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
IAU
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 6.31%
- 1Y
- 32.47%
- 3Y*
- 31.39%
- 5Y*
- 18.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
IYK vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 5.46% | 4.78% | 5.27% | -2.84% | 3.57% | 17.32% | 32.65% | 28.12% | -13.84% | 16.53% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 3.83% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | -4.00% | 25.03% | 17.98% | -1.76% | 12.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYK and IAU is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2005 | 0.05 |
IYK vs. IAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYK
IAU
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
IYK
IAU
-
Healthcare
IYK
IAU
-
Basic Materials
IYK
IAU
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYK
IAU
-
Industrials
IYK
IAU
-
Communication Services
IYK
-
IAU
-
Energy
IYK
-
IAU
-
Financial Services
IYK
-
IAU
-
Real Estate
IYK
-
IAU
Technology
IYK
-
IAU
-
Utilities
IYK
-
IAU
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYK vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
IYK
IAU
IYK vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IYK | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.25 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 1.70 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | 4.18 | -3.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IYK | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 | 1.24 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 1.04 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.84 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.63 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
IYK vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYK drawdown since its inception was -42.64%, smaller than the maximum IAU drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYK and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYK | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.64% | -45.14% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -19.18% | +8.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.14% | -19.18% | +7.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.05% | -20.93% | +5.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.19% | -21.82% | -11.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.10% | -17.02% | +7.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -15.96% | +10.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 7.79% | -2.74% |
Volatility
IYK vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) is 3.51%, while iShares Gold Trust (IAU) has a volatility of 5.50%. This indicates that IYK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYK | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.51% | 5.50% | -1.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.29% | 23.03% | -13.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.15% | 26.41% | -14.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.98% | 17.94% | -4.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.50% | 15.90% | -0.40% |
IYK vs. IAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYK has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IAU's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYK vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
IYK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, while IAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 2.69% | 2.75% | 2.63% | 2.74% | 2.16% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 2.21% | 2.81% | 1.74% | 2.63% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYK and IAU have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAU has higher volatility (5.50%) compared to IYK (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYK dropped -42.64% vs IAU's -45.14%.
On 10-year performance, IAU leads with 13.38% vs 8.83% for IYK. On fees, IAU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IYK has been the lower-risk option at 3.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAU has performed better with a 13.38% return vs 8.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYK.
IYK has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.00% for IAU.
IYK is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while IAU is Gold. IYK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index, while IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYK and 0.25% for IAU.
IAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYK and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer