IYJ vs. IYM
IYJ (iShares U.S. Industrials ETF) and IYM (iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYJ is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index, while IYM is a Materials fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYJ returned 12.54%/yr vs 11.23%/yr for IYM. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYJ charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYM.
Performance
IYJ vs. IYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYJ achieves a 7.60% return, which is significantly lower than IYM's 22.39% return. Over the past 10 years, IYJ has outperformed IYM with an annualized return of 12.54%, while IYM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.23% annualized return.
IYJ
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 7.60%
- 6M
- 6.77%
- 1Y
- 16.22%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 8.44%
- 10Y*
- 12.54%
IYM
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- YTD
- 22.39%
- 6M
- 23.93%
- 1Y
- 37.90%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 8.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
IYJ vs. IYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYJ iShares U.S. Industrials ETF | 7.60% | 11.94% | 17.82% | 19.94% | -13.53% | 17.02% | 17.37% | 32.27% | -11.69% | 23.98% |
IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF | 22.39% | 20.41% | -4.54% | 12.83% | -9.15% | 25.62% | 17.87% | 19.22% | -16.63% | 24.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYJ and IYM is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2000 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IYJ and IYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.80 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IYJ vs. IYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYJ
IYM
Industrials
Financial Services
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Industrials
IYJ
IYM
Financial Services
IYJ
IYM
-
Technology
IYJ
IYM
-
Basic Materials
IYJ
IYM
Utilities
IYJ
IYM
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYJ
IYM
Healthcare
IYJ
IYM
-
Communication Services
IYJ
-
IYM
-
Consumer Defensive
IYJ
-
IYM
-
Energy
IYJ
-
IYM
-
Real Estate
IYJ
-
IYM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYJ vs. IYM — Risk / Return Rank
IYJ
IYM
IYJ vs. IYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) and iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYJ | IYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.32 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 2.74 | -1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | 10.29 | -5.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYJ vs. IYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYJ drawdown since its inception was -61.97%, smaller than the maximum IYM drawdown of -67.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYJ and IYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYJ | IYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.97% | -67.78% | +5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.39% | -13.61% | +2.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.67% | -23.62% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.24% | -29.94% | +3.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.20% | -42.76% | +2.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.61% | -0.61% | -1.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -11.45% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.17% | 3.61% | -0.44% |
Volatility
IYJ vs. IYM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) is 5.76%, while iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF (IYM) has a volatility of 8.10%. This indicates that IYJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYJ | IYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.76% | 8.10% | -2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.57% | 15.79% | -3.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.71% | 19.55% | -3.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 20.53% | -2.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.91% | 21.77% | -1.86% |
IYJ vs. IYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYJ has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than IYM's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYJ vs. IYM - Dividend Comparison
IYJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than IYM's 1.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYJ iShares U.S. Industrials ETF | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 1.05% | 1.05% | 0.76% | 1.01% | 1.32% | 1.43% | 1.29% | 1.38% | 1.53% |
IYM iShares U.S. Basic Materials ETF | 1.23% | 1.51% | 1.65% | 1.77% | 2.14% | 1.48% | 1.39% | 2.08% | 1.68% | 1.43% | 1.47% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYJ and IYM have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYM has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to IYJ (5.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYJ dropped -61.97% vs IYM's -67.78%.
On 10-year performance, IYJ leads with 12.54% vs 11.23% for IYM. On fees, IYJ is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYJ has performed better with a 12.54% return vs 11.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYJ is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYM.
IYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.77% for IYJ.
IYJ is categorized as Industrials Equities, while IYM is Materials. IYJ tracks Dow Jones U.S. Industrials Index, while IYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for IYJ and 0.42% for IYM.
IYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYJ and IYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer