IYH vs. VWO
IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) and VWO (Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while VWO is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the FTSE Emerging Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYH returned 9.63%/yr vs 9.11%/yr for VWO. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYH charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VWO.
Performance
IYH vs. VWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYH achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly lower than VWO's 13.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IYH has outperformed VWO with an annualized return of 9.63%, while VWO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.11% annualized return.
IYH
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- 5.37%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 14.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.63%
VWO
- 1D
- 2.17%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- YTD
- 13.17%
- 6M
- 15.35%
- 1Y
- 29.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
IYH vs. VWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | -1.10% | 13.16% | 2.99% | 2.14% | -4.46% | 23.41% | 15.56% | 20.80% | 5.80% | 22.27% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 13.17% | 25.60% | 10.59% | 9.25% | -17.98% | 1.26% | 15.17% | 20.75% | -14.76% | 31.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYH and VWO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2005 | 0.53 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IYH and VWO has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IYH vs. VWO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYH
VWO
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
IYH
VWO
Basic Materials
IYH
-
VWO
Communication Services
IYH
-
VWO
Consumer Cyclical
IYH
-
VWO
Consumer Defensive
IYH
-
VWO
Energy
IYH
-
VWO
Financial Services
IYH
-
VWO
Industrials
IYH
-
VWO
Real Estate
IYH
-
VWO
Technology
IYH
-
VWO
Utilities
IYH
-
VWO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYH vs. VWO — Risk / Return Rank
IYH
VWO
IYH vs. VWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYH | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.33 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 2.63 | -1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.21 | 9.28 | -6.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYH vs. VWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYH drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum VWO drawdown of -67.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYH and VWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYH | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -67.68% | +24.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.64% | -11.17% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -17.37% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.91% | -32.60% | +14.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.40% | -36.39% | +7.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -0.57% | -3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.96% | -15.80% | +6.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 3.16% | +1.30% |
Volatility
IYH vs. VWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) is 4.97%, while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF (VWO) has a volatility of 6.98%. This indicates that IYH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYH | VWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 6.98% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.61% | 14.18% | -3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.11% | 16.62% | -1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 17.51% | -2.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.75% | 19.24% | -2.49% |
IYH vs. VWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYH has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than VWO's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYH vs. VWO - Dividend Comparison
IYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than VWO's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 1.51% | 1.19% | 1.25% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 2.02% |
VWO Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets ETF | 2.38% | 2.79% | 3.20% | 3.52% | 4.11% | 2.63% | 1.91% | 3.23% | 2.88% | 2.30% | 2.52% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYH and VWO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VWO has higher volatility (6.98%) compared to IYH (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYH dropped -43.12% vs VWO's -67.68%.
On 10-year performance, IYH leads with 9.63% vs 9.11% for VWO. On fees, VWO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, IYH has been the lower-risk option at 4.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYH has performed better with a 9.63% return vs 9.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VWO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.
VWO has the higher dividend yield at 2.38%, compared with 1.51% for IYH.
IYH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while VWO is Emerging Markets Equities. IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while VWO tracks FTSE Emerging Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IYH and 0.08% for VWO.
VWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYH and VWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer