IYH vs. PJP
IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) and PJP (Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - IYH tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index while PJP tracks the Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYH returned 9.52%/yr vs 6.98%/yr for PJP. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IYH charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PJP.
Performance
IYH vs. PJP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYH achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly lower than PJP's 17.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IYH has outperformed PJP with an annualized return of 9.52%, while PJP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.98% annualized return.
IYH
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- 6M
- 5.14%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 1Y
- 25.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.62%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.99%
PJP
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 14.14%
- YTD
- 17.06%
- 1Y
- 49.30%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 9.41%
- 10Y*
- 6.98%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $76.84M | $57.93M | $57.32M | |
| $6.54M | $7.65M | $3.59M |
IYH vs. PJP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 5.42% | 13.16% | 2.99% | 2.14% | -4.46% | 23.41% | 15.56% | 20.80% | 5.80% | 22.27% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 17.06% | 27.98% | 9.63% | -2.18% | -2.16% | 14.58% | 11.29% | 4.64% | -1.78% | 15.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYH and PJP is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.81 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2005 | 0.85 |
The correlation between IYH and PJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
IYH vs. PJP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYH
PJP
Healthcare
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IYH
PJP
Technology
IYH
PJP
-
Basic Materials
IYH
-
PJP
-
Communication Services
IYH
-
PJP
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYH
-
PJP
-
Consumer Defensive
IYH
-
PJP
-
Energy
IYH
-
PJP
-
Financial Services
IYH
-
PJP
Industrials
IYH
-
PJP
-
Real Estate
IYH
-
PJP
-
Utilities
IYH
-
PJP
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYH vs. PJP — Risk / Return Rank
IYH
PJP
IYH vs. PJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYH | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.49 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | 5.25 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.64 | 16.43 | -10.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYH vs. PJP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYH drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, which is greater than PJP's maximum drawdown of -37.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYH and PJP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYH | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -37.06% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.64% | -9.44% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -16.27% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.91% | -17.51% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.40% | -33.95% | +5.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -0.89% | -2.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.92% | -8.79% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.49% | 3.01% | +1.48% |
Volatility
IYH vs. PJP - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF (PJP) have volatilities of 5.25% and 5.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYH | PJP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 5.29% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.02% | 13.25% | -1.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.64% | 16.79% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.23% | 16.37% | -1.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.82% | 18.39% | -1.57% |
IYH vs. PJP - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYH has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than PJP's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYH vs. PJP - Dividend Comparison
IYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than PJP's 0.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 1.17% | 1.19% | 1.25% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 2.02% |
PJP Invesco Dynamic Pharmaceuticals ETF | 0.88% | 0.98% | 0.97% | 1.01% | 0.95% | 0.81% | 0.75% | 0.77% | 1.12% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 5.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYH and PJP have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PJP has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to IYH (5.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYH dropped -43.12% vs PJP's -37.06%.
On 10-year performance, IYH leads with 9.52% vs 6.98% for PJP. On fees, IYH is cheaper at 0.43% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYH has performed better with a 9.52% return vs 6.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYH is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PJP.
IYH has the higher dividend yield at 1.17%, compared with 0.88% for PJP.
IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while PJP tracks Dynamic Pharmaceuticals Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IYH and 0.58% for PJP.
PJP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYH and PJP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer