IYH vs. IYK
IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) and IYK (iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while IYK is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYH returned 9.52%/yr vs 9.42%/yr for IYK. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IYH charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IYK.
Performance
IYH vs. IYK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYH achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than IYK's 10.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IYH having a 9.52% annualized return and IYK not far behind at 9.42%.
IYH
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 4.45%
- YTD
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 0.07%
- 1Y
- 14.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
IYK
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 2.21%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 6.29%
- 3Y*
- 6.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.67%
- 10Y*
- 9.42%
IYH vs. IYK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | -0.65% | 13.16% | 2.99% | 2.14% | -4.46% | 23.41% | 15.56% | 20.80% | 5.80% | 22.27% |
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 10.91% | 4.78% | 5.27% | -2.84% | 3.57% | 17.32% | 32.65% | 28.12% | -13.84% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYH and IYK is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2000 | 0.63 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IYH and IYK has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IYH vs. IYK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYH
IYK
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
IYH
IYK
Basic Materials
IYH
-
IYK
Communication Services
IYH
-
IYK
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYH
-
IYK
Consumer Defensive
IYH
-
IYK
Energy
IYH
-
IYK
-
Financial Services
IYH
-
IYK
-
Industrials
IYH
-
IYK
Real Estate
IYH
-
IYK
-
Technology
IYH
-
IYK
-
Utilities
IYH
-
IYK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYH vs. IYK — Risk / Return Rank
IYH
IYK
IYH vs. IYK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYH | IYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.09 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 0.59 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.18 | 1.23 | +1.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYH vs. IYK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYH drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, roughly equal to the maximum IYK drawdown of -42.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYH and IYK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYH | IYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.12% | -42.64% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.64% | -10.68% | +0.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -12.14% | -5.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.91% | -15.05% | -2.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.40% | -33.19% | +4.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.94% | -4.40% | +0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.96% | -5.07% | -3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.46% | 5.13% | -0.67% |
Volatility
IYH vs. IYK - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF (IYK) have volatilities of 4.94% and 4.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYH | IYK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 4.75% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.64% | 9.77% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.10% | 12.59% | +2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.96% | 13.05% | +1.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 15.53% | +1.21% |
IYH vs. IYK - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYH has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than IYK's 0.42% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYH vs. IYK - Dividend Comparison
IYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than IYK's 2.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYH iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF | 1.25% | 1.19% | 1.25% | 1.18% | 1.10% | 0.94% | 1.16% | 1.14% | 1.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 2.02% |
IYK iShares U.S. Consumer Goods ETF | 2.56% | 2.75% | 2.63% | 2.74% | 2.16% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 2.21% | 2.81% | 1.74% | 2.63% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYH and IYK have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IYH has higher volatility (4.94%) compared to IYK (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYH dropped -43.12% vs IYK's -42.64%.
On 10-year performance, IYH leads with 9.52% vs 9.42% for IYK. On fees, IYK is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IYK has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IYH has performed better with a 9.52% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYK is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.
IYK has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 1.25% for IYH.
IYH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while IYK is Consumer Staples Equities. IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while IYK tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IYH and 0.42% for IYK.
IYH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYH and IYK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer