PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IYH vs. GNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IYH vs. GNR

Last updated Jul 21, 2026
Documentation

IYH (iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF) and GNR (SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYH is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while GNR is a Natural Resources fund tracking the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYH returned 9.38%/yr vs 9.66%/yr for GNR. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IYH charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GNR.

Performance

IYH vs. GNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IYH achieves a 3.48% return, which is significantly lower than GNR's 12.66% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IYH having a 9.38% annualized return and GNR not far ahead at 9.66%.

IYH

1D
-1.19%
1M
6.88%
6M
2.90%
YTD
3.48%
1Y
22.59%
3Y*
6.68%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
9.38%
ALL TIME*
7.93%

GNR

1D
-0.60%
1M
-0.46%
6M
5.21%
YTD
12.66%
1Y
29.46%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
10.04%
10Y*
9.66%
ALL TIME*
5.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IYH vs. GNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		3.48%13.16%2.99%2.14%-4.46%23.41%15.56%20.80%5.80%22.27%
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF		12.66%28.68%-8.27%2.95%10.20%24.73%-0.03%16.49%-13.19%22.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IYH and GNR is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2010

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between IYH and GNR has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IYH vs. GNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IYH
GNR

Healthcare

100.0%
0.0%

Basic Materials

-

53.5%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

5.4%

Energy

-

31.3%

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Industrials

-

0.3%

Real Estate

-

1.0%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

0.0%

Healthcare

IYH
100.0%
GNR
0.0%

Basic Materials

IYH

-

GNR
53.5%

Communication Services

IYH

-

GNR

-

Consumer Cyclical

IYH

-

GNR
8.5%

Consumer Defensive

IYH

-

GNR
5.4%

Energy

IYH

-

GNR
31.3%

Financial Services

IYH

-

GNR
0.0%

Industrials

IYH

-

GNR
0.3%

Real Estate

IYH

-

GNR
1.0%

Technology

IYH

-

GNR

-

Utilities

IYH

-

GNR
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF

SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF

Often compared with IYH:
IYH vs. VHTIYH vs. XLVIYH vs. SPYIYH vs. IYEIYH vs. IFRAIYH vs. BMEDIYH vs. IBB
Often compared with GNR:
GNR vs. REMXGNR vs. XLEGNR vs. BCIGNR vs. VAWGNR vs. SPYGNR vs. XLBGNR vs. MXI

Return for Risk

IYH vs. GNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IYH
IYH Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IYH Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
IYH Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
GNR
GNR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
GNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
GNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
GNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
GNR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IYH vs. GNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IYHGNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.43
1.73

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.26
2.27

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

2.69

-0.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.00

8.65

-3.65

IYH vs. GNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IYH Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the GNR Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IYH and GNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IYH vs. GNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IYH drawdown since its inception was -43.12%, smaller than the maximum GNR drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYH and GNR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IYHGNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.12%

-51.37%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

-10.99%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-21.15%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

-25.66%

+7.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.40%

-48.59%

+20.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.71%

-7.74%

+4.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.93%

-14.89%

+5.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.53%

3.42%

+1.11%

Volatility

IYH vs. GNR - Volatility Comparison

iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF (IYH) has a higher volatility of 6.30% compared to SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) at 4.42%. This indicates that IYH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IYHGNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.30%

4.42%

+1.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.87%

13.93%

-2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.86%

17.14%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.19%

20.20%

-5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.79%

21.76%

-4.97%

IYH vs. GNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IYH has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than GNR's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

IYH vs. GNR - Dividend Comparison

IYH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than GNR's 2.63% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GNR
SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF		2.63%2.76%4.73%3.37%4.37%3.44%2.78%3.84%3.51%2.40%2.06%4.59%
IYH
iShares U.S. Healthcare ETF		1.20%1.19%1.25%1.18%1.10%0.94%1.16%1.14%1.95%1.10%1.29%2.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

IYH and GNR have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IYH has higher volatility (6.30%) compared to GNR (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYH dropped -43.12% vs GNR's -51.37%.

On 10-year performance, GNR leads with 9.66% vs 9.38% for IYH. On fees, GNR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, GNR has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GNR has performed better with a 9.66% return vs 9.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GNR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for IYH.

GNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.63%, compared with 1.20% for IYH.

IYH is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while GNR is Natural Resources. IYH tracks Dow Jones U.S. Health Care Index, while GNR tracks S&P Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for IYH and 0.40% for GNR.

GNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IYH and GNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer