IYF vs. PIT
IYF (iShares U.S. Financials ETF) and PIT (VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IYF is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index, while PIT is a Commodities fund actively managed by VanEck. IYF is passively managed, while PIT is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IYF returned 22.98%/yr vs 19.51%/yr for PIT. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IYF charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PIT.
Performance
IYF vs. PIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYF achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly lower than PIT's 27.31% return.
IYF
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 4.16%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- -0.59%
- 1Y
- 12.56%
- 3Y*
- 22.98%
- 5Y*
- 11.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.86%
PIT
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- -10.60%
- YTD
- 27.31%
- 6M
- 26.74%
- 1Y
- 38.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IYF vs. PIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 0.50% | 18.25% | 31.30% | 15.32% | 0.24% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 27.31% | 21.63% | 6.77% | -4.54% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYF and PIT is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 2022 | 0.06 |
The correlation between IYF and PIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYF vs. PIT — Risk / Return Rank
IYF
PIT
IYF vs. PIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYF | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.32 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 2.74 | -1.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.45 | 10.88 | -8.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYF vs. PIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYF drawdown since its inception was -79.09%, which is greater than PIT's maximum drawdown of -14.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYF and PIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYF | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.09% | -14.05% | -65.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -14.05% | +0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -14.05% | -2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.57% | -14.05% | +11.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.58% | -4.07% | -13.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 3.59% | +1.55% |
Volatility
IYF vs. PIT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) is 4.13%, while VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF (PIT) has a volatility of 4.67%. This indicates that IYF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYF | PIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 4.67% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.19% | 19.36% | -8.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.55% | 21.66% | -7.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 17.50% | +1.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 17.50% | +3.41% |
IYF vs. PIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYF has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than PIT's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYF vs. PIT - Dividend Comparison
IYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, less than PIT's 7.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 1.49% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.64% | 1.90% | 1.46% | 1.67% | 1.66% |
PIT VanEck Commodity Strategy ETF | 7.00% | 8.92% | 3.59% | 6.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYF and PIT have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PIT has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to IYF (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYF dropped -79.09% vs PIT's -14.05%.
On 3-year performance, IYF leads with 22.98% vs 19.51% for PIT. On fees, IYF is cheaper at 0.42% per year. On volatility, IYF has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IYF has performed better with a 22.98% return vs 19.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IYF is cheaper with a 0.42% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PIT.
PIT has the higher dividend yield at 7.00%, compared with 1.49% for IYF.
IYF is categorized as Financials Equities, while PIT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYF and 0.55% for PIT.
PIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYF and PIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer