IYF vs. IAI
IYF (iShares U.S. Financials ETF) and IAI (iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF) are both Financials Equities funds from iShares - IYF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index while IAI tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Investment Services Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IYF returned 13.90%/yr vs 19.81%/yr for IAI. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IYF charges 0.42%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for IAI.
Performance
IYF vs. IAI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IYF achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than IAI's 4.12% return. Over the past 10 years, IYF has underperformed IAI with an annualized return of 13.90%, while IAI has yielded a comparatively higher 19.81% annualized return.
IYF
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 4.59%
- YTD
- 0.92%
- 6M
- -0.33%
- 1Y
- 11.89%
- 3Y*
- 23.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.53%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
IAI
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 3.38%
- YTD
- 4.12%
- 6M
- 2.06%
- 1Y
- 17.16%
- 3Y*
- 29.87%
- 5Y*
- 14.88%
- 10Y*
- 19.81%
IYF vs. IAI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 0.92% | 18.25% | 31.30% | 15.32% | -11.33% | 31.60% | -1.00% | 31.86% | -9.39% | 19.58% |
IAI iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF | 4.12% | 25.80% | 34.37% | 15.27% | -10.87% | 40.48% | 18.61% | 24.26% | -9.47% | 28.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between IYF and IAI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2006 | 0.89 |
The correlation between IYF and IAI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
IYF vs. IAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IYF
IAI
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IYF
IAI
Real Estate
IYF
IAI
-
Technology
IYF
IAI
Basic Materials
IYF
-
IAI
-
Communication Services
IYF
-
IAI
-
Consumer Cyclical
IYF
-
IAI
-
Consumer Defensive
IYF
-
IAI
-
Energy
IYF
-
IAI
-
Healthcare
IYF
-
IAI
-
Industrials
IYF
-
IAI
-
Utilities
IYF
-
IAI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IYF vs. IAI — Risk / Return Rank
IYF
IAI
IYF vs. IAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) and iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IYF | IAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.16 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 1.04 | -0.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.32 | 2.96 | -0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IYF vs. IAI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IYF drawdown since its inception was -79.09%, roughly equal to the maximum IAI drawdown of -75.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IYF and IAI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IYF | IAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.09% | -75.46% | -3.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.88% | -16.52% | +2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.60% | -23.14% | +6.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | -28.84% | +3.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.57% | -40.38% | -2.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -1.91% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.58% | -22.61% | +5.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.14% | 5.80% | -0.66% |
Volatility
IYF vs. IAI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Financials ETF (IYF) is 4.13%, while iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that IYF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IYF | IAI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.13% | 5.64% | -1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.19% | 15.39% | -4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.53% | 19.29% | -4.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 21.42% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.84% | 22.75% | -1.91% |
IYF vs. IAI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IYF has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than IAI's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
IYF vs. IAI - Dividend Comparison
IYF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, more than IAI's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IAI iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF | 1.10% | 0.95% | 1.05% | 1.80% | 2.14% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.52% | 1.58% | 1.37% | 1.49% | 1.31% |
IYF iShares U.S. Financials ETF | 1.48% | 1.32% | 1.29% | 1.67% | 1.86% | 1.27% | 1.72% | 1.64% | 1.90% | 1.46% | 1.67% | 1.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IYF and IAI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAI has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to IYF (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IYF dropped -79.09% vs IAI's -75.46%.
On 10-year performance, IAI leads with 19.81% vs 13.90% for IYF. On fees, IAI is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, IYF has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IAI has performed better with a 19.81% return vs 13.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IAI is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IYF.
IYF has the higher dividend yield at 1.48%, compared with 1.10% for IAI.
IYF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index, while IAI tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Investment Services Index. Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IYF and 0.38% for IAI.
IAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IYF and IAI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer