PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXUS vs. IXC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXUS vs. IXC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXUS achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 29.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IXUS having a 10.23% annualized return and IXC not far behind at 10.05%.


IXUS

1D
0.43%
1M
3.19%
YTD
13.86%
6M
15.66%
1Y
30.13%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
10.23%

IXC

1D
0.28%
1M
-3.42%
YTD
29.17%
6M
28.84%
1Y
36.66%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
19.14%
10Y*
10.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXUS vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
13.86%32.40%5.19%15.83%-16.47%8.86%10.80%21.71%-14.41%28.12%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
29.17%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%5.54%

Correlation

The correlation between IXUS and IXC is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between IXUS and IXC has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IXUS vs. IXC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXUS
IXC

Technology

24.0%

-

Financial Services

22.9%

-

Industrials

13.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%

-

Basic Materials

7.0%

-

Healthcare

6.4%

-

Energy

4.8%
100.0%

Communication Services

4.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.6%

-

Utilities

2.7%

-

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Technology

IXUS
24.0%
IXC

-

Financial Services

IXUS
22.9%
IXC

-

Industrials

IXUS
13.9%
IXC

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXUS
7.1%
IXC

-

Basic Materials

IXUS
7.0%
IXC

-

Healthcare

IXUS
6.4%
IXC

-

Energy

IXUS
4.8%
IXC
100.0%

Communication Services

IXUS
4.6%
IXC

-

Consumer Defensive

IXUS
4.6%
IXC

-

Utilities

IXUS
2.7%
IXC

-

Real Estate

IXUS
1.2%
IXC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXUS vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXUS
IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXUS vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IXUSIXCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.34

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.51

4.05

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.67

11.55

-1.88

IXUS vs. IXC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the IXC Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXUS and IXC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXUS vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXUS drawdown since its inception was -36.22%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXUS and IXC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXUSIXCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.22%

-67.88%

+31.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-9.66%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-19.06%

+5.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.03%

-24.93%

-5.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.22%

-64.16%

+27.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.57%

-7.04%

+5.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-17.47%

+9.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.38%

-0.43%

Volatility

IXUS vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) at 6.44%. This indicates that IXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXUSIXCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

6.44%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.23%

15.63%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.29%

18.79%

-2.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.38%

23.53%

-7.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

26.84%

-9.72%

IXUS vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXUS vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison

IXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, which matches IXC's 2.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
2.85%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
2.84%3.24%3.33%3.13%2.48%3.12%1.85%3.09%3.00%2.41%2.58%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXUS and IXC have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXUS has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to IXC (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXUS dropped -36.22% vs IXC's -67.88%.

On 10-year performance, IXUS leads with 10.23% vs 10.05% for IXC. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IXC has been the lower-risk option at 6.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXUS has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.

IXUS and IXC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.84%.

IXUS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IXC is Energy Equities. IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net), while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IXUS and 0.40% for IXC.

IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXUS and IXC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer