PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXUS vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXUS vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXUS achieves a 15.55% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IXUS has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 10.24%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.33% annualized return.


IXUS

1D
1.49%
1M
4.72%
YTD
15.55%
6M
17.02%
1Y
32.06%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
8.74%
10Y*
10.24%

GLD

1D
2.59%
1M
-4.97%
YTD
0.06%
6M
0.19%
1Y
25.38%
3Y*
29.73%
5Y*
18.31%
10Y*
12.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXUS vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
15.55%32.40%5.19%15.83%-16.47%8.86%10.80%21.71%-14.41%28.12%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.06%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between IXUS and GLD is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012

0.18

Over the past year, IXUS and GLD have become more correlated (0.44) than their long-term average of 0.18, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXUS vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXUS
IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXUS vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IXUSGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.19

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

1.04

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.91

2.97

+7.94

IXUS vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXUS Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXUS and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXUS vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXUS drawdown since its inception was -36.22%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXUS and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXUSGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.22%

-45.56%

+9.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-24.46%

+13.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-24.46%

+10.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.03%

-24.46%

-5.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.22%

-24.46%

-11.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-20.03%

+19.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.49%

-16.16%

+8.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

8.59%

-5.64%

Volatility

IXUS vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) is 7.02%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 8.37%. This indicates that IXUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXUSGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.02%

8.37%

-1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

24.21%

-9.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.31%

27.49%

-11.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.40%

18.26%

-1.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.13%

16.10%

+1.03%

IXUS vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXUS vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

IXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
4.12%3.24%3.33%3.13%2.48%3.12%1.85%3.09%3.00%2.41%2.58%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXUS and GLD have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (8.37%) compared to IXUS (7.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXUS dropped -36.22% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 12.33% vs 10.24% for IXUS. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IXUS has been the lower-risk option at 7.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 12.33% return vs 10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

IXUS has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

IXUS is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GLD is Gold. IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net), while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IXUS and 0.40% for GLD.

IXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXUS and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer