PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXUS vs. DWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXUS vs. DWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXUS achieves a 14.51% return, which is significantly higher than DWX's 6.23% return. Over the past 10 years, IXUS has outperformed DWX with an annualized return of 9.78%, while DWX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.29% annualized return.


IXUS

1D
-1.01%
1M
4.91%
YTD
14.51%
6M
17.16%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
9.78%

DWX

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.58%
YTD
6.23%
6M
8.31%
1Y
15.79%
3Y*
14.97%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
7.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXUS vs. DWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
14.51%32.40%5.19%15.83%-16.47%8.86%10.80%21.71%-14.41%28.12%
DWX
SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
6.23%31.62%2.56%14.74%-12.99%10.56%-5.10%20.26%-11.11%18.91%

Correlation

The correlation between IXUS and DWX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.86

The correlation between IXUS and DWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXUS vs. DWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXUS
DWX

Financial Services

22.4%
16.4%

Technology

18.0%
2.8%

Industrials

15.9%
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
6.2%

Basic Materials

7.6%
2.3%

Healthcare

7.1%
4.5%

Energy

5.2%
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
12.6%

Communication Services

4.8%
12.8%

Utilities

3.2%
11.3%

Real Estate

2.5%
10.5%

Financial Services

IXUS
22.4%
DWX
16.4%

Technology

IXUS
18.0%
DWX
2.8%

Industrials

IXUS
15.9%
DWX
10.2%

Consumer Cyclical

IXUS
8.3%
DWX
6.2%

Basic Materials

IXUS
7.6%
DWX
2.3%

Healthcare

IXUS
7.1%
DWX
4.5%

Energy

IXUS
5.2%
DWX
10.4%

Consumer Defensive

IXUS
5.1%
DWX
12.6%

Communication Services

IXUS
4.8%
DWX
12.8%

Utilities

IXUS
3.2%
DWX
11.3%

Real Estate

IXUS
2.5%
DWX
10.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXUS vs. DWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXUS
IXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
IXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
IXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

DWX
DWX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
DWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
DWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXUS vs. DWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) and SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXUSDWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.27

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

1.85

+1.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

6.01

+5.12

IXUS vs. DWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the DWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXUS and DWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXUSDWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.47

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.59

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.48

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.12

+0.37

Drawdowns

IXUS vs. DWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXUS drawdown since its inception was -36.22%, smaller than the maximum DWX drawdown of -66.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXUS and DWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXUSDWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.22%

-66.86%

+30.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.36%

-8.59%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.75%

-10.65%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.04%

-26.96%

-3.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.22%

-36.05%

-0.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-4.12%

+3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.50%

-14.13%

+6.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.90%

2.63%

+0.27%

Volatility

IXUS vs. DWX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF (IXUS) has a higher volatility of 5.64% compared to SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF (DWX) at 2.92%. This indicates that IXUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXUSDWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

2.92%

+2.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

8.66%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.37%

10.80%

+4.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

12.20%

+4.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.07%

15.09%

+1.98%

IXUS vs. DWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXUS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than DWX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXUS vs. DWX - Dividend Comparison

IXUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than DWX's 4.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWX
SPDR S&P International Dividend ETF
4.20%4.44%4.31%4.12%4.68%3.89%3.84%4.40%5.06%3.85%5.25%5.81%
IXUS
iShares Core MSCI Total International Stock ETF
2.83%3.24%3.33%3.13%2.48%3.12%1.85%3.09%3.00%2.41%2.58%2.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXUS and DWX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXUS has higher volatility (5.64%) compared to DWX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXUS dropped -36.22% vs DWX's -66.86%.

On 10-year performance, IXUS leads with 9.78% vs 7.29% for DWX. On fees, IXUS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, DWX has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXUS has performed better with a 9.78% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXUS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for DWX.

DWX has the higher dividend yield at 4.20%, compared with 2.83% for IXUS.

IXUS tracks MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index (Net), while DWX tracks S&P International Dividend Opportunities Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IXUS and 0.45% for DWX.

IXUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXUS and DWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer