PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXN vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXN vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a 33.08% return, which is significantly higher than GRID's 23.59% return. Over the past 10 years, IXN has outperformed GRID with an annualized return of 25.03%, while GRID has yielded a comparatively lower 19.76% annualized return.


IXN

1D
0.42%
1M
3.37%
YTD
33.08%
6M
35.17%
1Y
62.93%
3Y*
32.38%
5Y*
21.51%
10Y*
25.03%

GRID

1D
-0.18%
1M
-4.22%
YTD
23.59%
6M
24.02%
1Y
43.17%
3Y*
23.21%
5Y*
16.83%
10Y*
19.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXN vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
33.08%25.25%24.84%52.98%-29.86%29.58%43.62%47.88%-5.44%41.23%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
23.59%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-22.69%27.44%

Correlation

The correlation between IXN and GRID is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2009

0.68

The correlation between IXN and GRID shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXN vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXN
GRID

Technology

99.2%
12.6%

Industrials

0.2%
24.4%

Energy

0.1%
1.6%

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

0.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Utilities

-

3.9%

Technology

IXN
99.2%
GRID
12.6%

Industrials

IXN
0.2%
GRID
24.4%

Energy

IXN
0.1%
GRID
1.6%

Healthcare

IXN
0.1%
GRID

-

Real Estate

IXN
0.0%
GRID

-

Basic Materials

IXN

-

GRID
0.0%

Communication Services

IXN

-

GRID

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXN

-

GRID
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

IXN

-

GRID

-

Financial Services

IXN

-

GRID

-

Utilities

IXN

-

GRID
3.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXN vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXN
IXN Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
IXN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXN Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXN Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IXN Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXN Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXN vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IXNGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.35

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.39

3.57

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.35

12.89

+1.46

IXN vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXN Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXN and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXN vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, which is greater than GRID's maximum drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXNGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.67%

-40.56%

-15.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.80%

-11.73%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.55%

-20.77%

-4.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.30%

-29.64%

-6.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.30%

-40.56%

+4.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.68%

-5.40%

-1.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.26%

-8.42%

-2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.21%

3.25%

+0.96%

Volatility

IXN vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a higher volatility of 12.01% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) at 9.56%. This indicates that IXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXNGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.01%

9.56%

+2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.45%

17.70%

+2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.03%

20.73%

+3.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.19%

21.24%

+3.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.58%

22.90%

+1.68%

IXN vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXN has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXN vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, less than GRID's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%
IXN
iShares Global Tech ETF
0.78%1.04%0.43%0.55%0.81%0.58%0.63%1.06%0.94%0.93%1.03%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXN and GRID have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXN has higher volatility (12.01%) compared to GRID (9.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXN dropped -55.67% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 10-year performance, IXN leads with 25.03% vs 19.76% for GRID. On fees, IXN is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, GRID has been the lower-risk option at 9.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IXN has performed better with a 25.03% return vs 19.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXN is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.78% for IXN.

IXN is categorized as Technology Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. IXN tracks S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXN and 0.70% for GRID.

IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXN and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer