IXN vs. COST
IXN (iShares Global Tech ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Information Technology Sector Index, while COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, IXN returned 24.76%/yr vs 22.25%/yr for COST. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IXN vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXN achieves a 32.00% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 13.35% return. Over the past 10 years, IXN has outperformed COST with an annualized return of 24.76%, while COST has yielded a comparatively lower 22.25% annualized return.
IXN
- 1D
- 2.45%
- 1M
- 4.20%
- YTD
- 32.00%
- 6M
- 30.10%
- 1Y
- 61.63%
- 3Y*
- 33.24%
- 5Y*
- 21.65%
- 10Y*
- 24.76%
COST
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- YTD
- 13.35%
- 6M
- 10.14%
- 1Y
- -3.42%
- 3Y*
- 25.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.05%
- 10Y*
- 22.25%
IXN vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 32.00% | 25.25% | 24.84% | 52.98% | -29.86% | 29.58% | 43.62% | 47.88% | -5.44% | 41.23% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 13.35% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 51.82% | 32.67% | 45.70% | 10.60% | 22.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXN and COST is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 27, 2001 | 0.44 |
The correlation between IXN and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXN vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
IXN
COST
IXN vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IXN | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 0.98 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.49 | -0.22 | +4.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.19 | -0.51 | +15.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IXN | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | -0.18 | +2.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.98 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.01 | 1.02 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.59 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
IXN vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXN drawdown since its inception was -55.67%, roughly equal to the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXN and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXN | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.67% | -53.39% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.80% | -15.38% | +1.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.55% | -20.74% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.30% | -31.40% | -4.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.30% | -31.40% | -4.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.44% | -10.93% | +3.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.27% | -13.36% | +2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 7.15% | -3.08% |
Volatility
IXN vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN) has a higher volatility of 11.51% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 7.71%. This indicates that IXN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXN | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.51% | 7.71% | +3.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.70% | 14.53% | +5.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.42% | 18.79% | +4.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.08% | 22.71% | +2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 21.95% | +2.58% |
Dividends
IXN vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
IXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than COST's 0.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
IXN iShares Global Tech ETF | 0.79% | 1.04% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.81% | 0.58% | 0.63% | 1.06% | 0.94% | 0.93% | 1.03% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXN and COST have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXN has higher volatility (11.51%) compared to COST (7.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXN dropped -55.67% vs COST's -53.39%.
IXN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXN and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer