PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXJ vs. IDNA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXJ vs. IDNA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) and iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund (IDNA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXJ achieves a -5.26% return, which is significantly lower than IDNA's 10.31% return.


IXJ

1D
0.39%
1M
0.34%
YTD
-5.26%
6M
-4.88%
1Y
9.30%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
7.66%

IDNA

1D
0.73%
1M
-2.56%
YTD
10.31%
6M
8.52%
1Y
40.87%
3Y*
6.74%
5Y*
-8.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXJ vs. IDNA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
-5.26%14.99%0.55%3.62%-4.94%19.60%12.74%14.12%
IDNA
iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund
10.31%17.26%-0.72%-7.63%-42.28%-3.98%54.30%20.83%

Correlation

The correlation between IXJ and IDNA is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019

0.61

The correlation between IXJ and IDNA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

IXJ vs. IDNA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXJ
IDNA

Healthcare

98.9%
97.8%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

IXJ
98.9%
IDNA
97.8%

Consumer Defensive

IXJ
0.5%
IDNA

-

Basic Materials

IXJ

-

IDNA

-

Communication Services

IXJ

-

IDNA

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXJ

-

IDNA

-

Energy

IXJ

-

IDNA

-

Financial Services

IXJ

-

IDNA

-

Industrials

IXJ

-

IDNA
0.4%

Real Estate

IXJ

-

IDNA

-

Technology

IXJ

-

IDNA

-

Utilities

IXJ

-

IDNA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXJ vs. IDNA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXJ
IXJ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IDNA
IDNA Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
IDNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDNA Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
IDNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDNA Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXJ vs. IDNA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) and iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund (IDNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXJIDNADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.64

1.68

-1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.06

2.44

-1.38

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.27

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

3.85

-2.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.11

10.98

-8.87

IXJ vs. IDNA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the IDNA Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXJ and IDNA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXJIDNADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

1.68

-1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

-0.30

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.10

+0.32

Drawdowns

IXJ vs. IDNA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXJ drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, smaller than the maximum IDNA drawdown of -68.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXJ and IDNA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXJIDNADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.60%

-68.26%

+27.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.78%

-10.66%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.14%

-29.73%

+11.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

-68.26%

+50.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.27%

-45.61%

+36.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-36.24%

+29.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

3.73%

+0.68%

Volatility

IXJ vs. IDNA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) is 3.75%, while iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund (IDNA) has a volatility of 7.18%. This indicates that IXJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXJIDNADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

7.18%

-3.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

17.98%

-7.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

24.48%

-9.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

28.42%

-14.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

29.53%

-13.86%

IXJ vs. IDNA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXJ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than IDNA's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXJ vs. IDNA - Dividend Comparison

IXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than IDNA's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDNA
iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund
1.07%1.18%0.98%1.04%0.54%0.70%0.26%0.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
1.47%1.40%1.50%1.38%1.17%1.12%1.27%1.42%2.11%1.46%1.73%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXJ and IDNA have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDNA has higher volatility (7.18%) compared to IXJ (3.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXJ dropped -40.60% vs IDNA's -68.26%.

On 5-year performance, IXJ leads with 4.02% vs -8.42% for IDNA. On fees, IXJ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXJ has been the lower-risk option at 3.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IXJ has performed better with a 4.02% return vs -8.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXJ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IDNA.

IXJ has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.07% for IDNA.

IXJ tracks S&P Global Healthcare Sector Index, while IDNA tracks NYSE FactSet Global Genomics and Immuno Biopharma Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXJ and 0.47% for IDNA.

IDNA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXJ and IDNA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer