PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXJ vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXJ vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXJ achieves a -5.26% return, which is significantly lower than DGRO's 8.76% return. Over the past 10 years, IXJ has underperformed DGRO with an annualized return of 7.66%, while DGRO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.30% annualized return.


IXJ

1D
0.39%
1M
0.34%
YTD
-5.26%
6M
-4.88%
1Y
9.30%
3Y*
4.42%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
7.66%

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXJ vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
-5.26%14.99%0.55%3.62%-4.94%19.60%12.74%23.23%2.83%20.44%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%9.50%29.87%-2.38%23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IXJ and DGRO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014

0.75

The correlation between IXJ and DGRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXJ vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXJ
DGRO

Healthcare

98.9%
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
11.5%

Basic Materials

-

2.5%

Communication Services

-

0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.7%

Energy

-

5.6%

Financial Services

-

21.2%

Industrials

-

10.8%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

19.4%

Utilities

-

6.9%

Healthcare

IXJ
98.9%
DGRO
16.4%

Consumer Defensive

IXJ
0.5%
DGRO
11.5%

Basic Materials

IXJ

-

DGRO
2.5%

Communication Services

IXJ

-

DGRO
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

IXJ

-

DGRO
5.7%

Energy

IXJ

-

DGRO
5.6%

Financial Services

IXJ

-

DGRO
21.2%

Industrials

IXJ

-

DGRO
10.8%

Real Estate

IXJ

-

DGRO

-

Technology

IXJ

-

DGRO
19.4%

Utilities

IXJ

-

DGRO
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXJ vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXJ
IXJ Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXJ vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXJDGRODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.43

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

3.50

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.11

13.52

-11.41

IXJ vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXJ and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXJDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

2.39

-1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.77

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.80

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.76

-0.35

Drawdowns

IXJ vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXJ drawdown since its inception was -40.60%, which is greater than DGRO's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXJ and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXJDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.60%

-35.10%

-5.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.78%

-6.47%

-4.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.14%

-14.03%

-4.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

-19.31%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.35%

-35.10%

+7.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.27%

-0.28%

-8.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-3.44%

-3.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.41%

1.67%

+2.74%

Volatility

IXJ vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ) has a higher volatility of 3.75% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that IXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXJDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.75%

2.21%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

6.91%

+3.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.55%

9.48%

+5.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.21%

13.82%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.67%

16.62%

-0.95%

IXJ vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXJ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXJ vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

IXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
IXJ
iShares Global Healthcare ETF
1.47%1.40%1.50%1.38%1.17%1.12%1.27%1.42%2.11%1.46%1.73%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXJ and DGRO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXJ has higher volatility (3.75%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXJ dropped -40.60% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 10-year performance, DGRO leads with 13.30% vs 7.66% for IXJ. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 13.30% return vs 7.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXJ.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 1.47% for IXJ.

IXJ is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. IXJ tracks S&P Global Healthcare Sector Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXJ and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXJ and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer