IXG vs. KBWP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

IXG (iShares Global Financials ETF) and KBWP (Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - IXG tracks the S&P Global Financials Sector Index while KBWP tracks the KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXG returned 11.83%/yr vs 11.22%/yr for KBWP. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXG charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KBWP.

Performance

IXG vs. KBWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXG achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than KBWP's -8.80% return. Over the past 10 years, IXG has outperformed KBWP with an annualized return of 11.83%, while KBWP has yielded a comparatively lower 11.22% annualized return.

IXG

• 1D: -1.08%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: -0.23%
• 6M: 3.74%
• 1Y: 12.70%
• 3Y*: 22.63%
• 5Y*: 10.96%
• 10Y*: 11.83%

KBWP

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: -2.90%
• YTD: -8.80%
• 6M: -4.88%
• 1Y: -7.04%
• 3Y*: 14.48%
• 5Y*: 9.97%
• 10Y*: 11.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXG vs. KBWP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF	-0.23%	28.54%	25.69%	14.97%	-8.97%	25.07%	-2.99%	24.60%	-16.33%	23.78%
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF	-8.80%	11.49%	30.45%	7.09%	10.16%	20.61%	-2.05%	28.67%	-2.76%	8.86%

Correlation

The correlation between IXG and KBWP is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.62
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2010	0.57

The correlation between IXG and KBWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.64 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXG vs. KBWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IXG	KBWP
Financial Services	97.8%	100.0%
Technology	1.1%	-
Industrials	0.2%	-
Energy	0.1%	-
Healthcare	0.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

IXG vs. KBWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXG

IXG Risk / Return Rank: 25
IXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
IXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
IXG Omega Ratio Rank: 24
IXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
IXG Martin Ratio Rank: 28

KBWP

KBWP Risk / Return Rank: 3
KBWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KBWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
KBWP Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KBWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
KBWP Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXG vs. KBWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IXG	KBWP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	-0.44	+1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	-0.49	+1.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	0.94	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	-0.74	+1.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.97	-1.56	+5.53
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IXG vs. KBWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXG Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the KBWP Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXG and KBWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IXG	KBWP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	-0.44	+1.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.54	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.59	0.54	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.69	-0.45

Drawdowns

IXG vs. KBWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXG drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, which is greater than KBWP's maximum drawdown of -39.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXG and KBWP.

Drawdown Indicators

	IXG	KBWP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.42%	-39.76%	-38.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.33%	-9.56%	-1.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.54%	-12.29%	-1.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.20%	-17.00%	-10.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.47%	-39.76%	-3.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.88%	-9.56%	+6.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.75%	-4.37%	-15.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	4.72%	-1.51%

Volatility

IXG vs. KBWP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) is 3.70%, while Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF (KBWP) has a volatility of 4.16%. This indicates that IXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBWP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IXG	KBWP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	4.16%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.90%	11.41%	-0.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.67%	16.20%	-2.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.34%	18.53%	-1.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.12%	20.70%	-0.58%

IXG vs. KBWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than KBWP's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IXG vs. KBWP - Dividend Comparison

IXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, which matches KBWP's 2.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF	2.05%	2.04%	2.64%	2.62%	3.71%	1.69%	2.13%	2.87%	3.14%	2.12%	2.21%	2.79%
KBWP Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Insurance ETF	2.03%	1.58%	1.64%	1.68%	1.99%	3.02%	1.93%	1.99%	2.11%	1.90%	2.14%	1.35%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IXG and KBWP in my portfolio?

IXG and KBWP have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IXG or KBWP?

KBWP has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to IXG (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXG dropped -78.42% vs KBWP's -39.76%.

Which ETF is better, IXG or KBWP?

On 10-year performance, IXG leads with 11.83% vs 11.22% for KBWP. On fees, KBWP is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IXG or KBWP?

Over the 10-year period, IXG has performed better with a 11.83% return vs 11.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IXG or KBWP?

KBWP is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for IXG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IXG or KBWP?

IXG has the higher dividend yield at 2.05%, compared with 2.03% for KBWP.

What is the main difference between IXG and KBWP?

IXG tracks S&P Global Financials Sector Index, while KBWP tracks KBW Nasdaq Property & Casualty (TR). They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXG and 0.35% for KBWP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.