IXG vs. FNCL
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL).
IXG and FNCL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IXG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Financials Sector Index. It was launched on Nov 12, 2001. FNCL is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Financials Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both IXG and FNCL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
IXG vs. FNCL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
IXG vs. FNCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | -5.62% | 28.54% | 25.69% | 14.97% | -8.97% | 25.07% | -2.99% | 24.60% | -16.33% | 23.78% |
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | -9.17% | 14.94% | 30.44% | 14.10% | -12.28% | 34.92% | -2.19% | 31.59% | -13.44% | 19.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXG achieves a -5.62% return, which is significantly higher than FNCL's -9.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IXG has underperformed FNCL with an annualized return of 11.63%, while FNCL has yielded a comparatively higher 12.25% annualized return.
IXG
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -4.83%
- YTD
- -5.62%
- 6M
- -1.42%
- 1Y
- 13.11%
- 3Y*
- 21.31%
- 5Y*
- 11.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.63%
FNCL
- 1D
- 2.23%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- -9.17%
- 6M
- -7.18%
- 1Y
- 2.69%
- 3Y*
- 17.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IXG vs. FNCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FNCL's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
IXG vs. FNCL — Risk / Return Rank
IXG
FNCL
IXG vs. FNCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IXG | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.73 | 0.14 | +0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.09 | 0.32 | +0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.05 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 0.26 | +0.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | 0.79 | +3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IXG | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 | 0.14 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.48 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.55 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.52 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between IXG and FNCL is 0.92, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
IXG vs. FNCL - Dividend Comparison
IXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%, more than FNCL's 1.75% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 2.16% | 2.04% | 2.64% | 2.62% | 3.71% | 1.69% | 2.13% | 2.87% | 3.14% | 2.12% | 2.21% | 2.79% |
FNCL Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF | 1.75% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 1.91% | 2.29% | 1.75% | 2.26% | 2.17% | 2.37% | 1.60% | 1.81% | 2.17% |
Drawdowns
IXG vs. FNCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXG drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, which is greater than FNCL's maximum drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXG and FNCL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXG | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.42% | -44.38% | -34.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.79% | -14.78% | +1.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.20% | -25.68% | -1.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.47% | -44.38% | +0.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.13% | -11.94% | +3.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.88% | -6.89% | -12.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 4.92% | -1.48% |
Volatility
IXG vs. FNCL - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) has a higher volatility of 5.96% compared to Fidelity MSCI Financials Index ETF (FNCL) at 4.88%. This indicates that IXG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNCL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| IXG | FNCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.96% | 4.88% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.50% | 11.75% | -1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.12% | 20.02% | -1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 19.34% | -2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.15% | 22.35% | -2.20% |