IXG vs. BPAY
IXG (iShares Global Financials ETF) and BPAY (BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. IXG is passively managed, while BPAY is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IXG returned 22.63%/yr vs 8.49%/yr for BPAY. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXG charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BPAY.
Performance
IXG vs. BPAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXG achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than BPAY's -12.44% return.
IXG
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 0.73%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 3.74%
- 1Y
- 12.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.96%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
BPAY
- 1D
- -4.23%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- -12.44%
- 6M
- -14.32%
- 1Y
- -10.80%
- 3Y*
- 8.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXG vs. BPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | -0.23% | 28.54% | 25.69% | 14.97% | 0.18% |
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | -12.44% | 8.54% | 17.28% | 13.19% | -16.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXG and BPAY is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2022 | 0.79 |
The correlation between IXG and BPAY shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IXG vs. BPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXG
BPAY
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IXG
BPAY
Technology
IXG
BPAY
Industrials
IXG
BPAY
Energy
IXG
BPAY
-
Healthcare
IXG
BPAY
-
Consumer Cyclical
IXG
BPAY
Basic Materials
IXG
-
BPAY
-
Communication Services
IXG
-
BPAY
-
Consumer Defensive
IXG
-
BPAY
-
Real Estate
IXG
-
BPAY
Utilities
IXG
-
BPAY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXG vs. BPAY — Risk / Return Rank
IXG
BPAY
IXG vs. BPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IXG | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.95 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | -0.32 | +1.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.97 | -0.64 | +4.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IXG | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | -0.42 | +1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.06 | +0.18 |
Drawdowns
IXG vs. BPAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXG drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, which is greater than BPAY's maximum drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXG and BPAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXG | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.42% | -33.62% | -44.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.33% | -33.62% | +22.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.54% | -33.62% | +20.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.88% | -26.03% | +23.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.75% | -10.54% | -9.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 16.98% | -13.77% |
Volatility
IXG vs. BPAY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) is 3.70%, while BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that IXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXG | BPAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 6.91% | -3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.90% | 18.71% | -7.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.67% | 26.01% | -12.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 24.35% | -7.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 24.35% | -4.23% |
IXG vs. BPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than BPAY's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXG vs. BPAY - Dividend Comparison
IXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than BPAY's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BPAY BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF | 7.41% | 6.49% | 0.48% | 1.18% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXG iShares Global Financials ETF | 2.05% | 2.04% | 2.64% | 2.62% | 3.71% | 1.69% | 2.13% | 2.87% | 3.14% | 2.12% | 2.21% | 2.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXG and BPAY have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BPAY has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to IXG (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXG dropped -78.42% vs BPAY's -33.62%.
On 3-year performance, IXG leads with 22.63% vs 8.49% for BPAY. On fees, IXG is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IXG has performed better with a 22.63% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IXG is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BPAY.
BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 2.05% for IXG.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXG and 0.70% for BPAY.
IXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXG and BPAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer