PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IXG vs. BPAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IXG vs. BPAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXG achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly higher than BPAY's -12.44% return.


IXG

1D
-1.08%
1M
0.73%
YTD
-0.23%
6M
3.74%
1Y
12.70%
3Y*
22.63%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
11.83%

BPAY

1D
-4.23%
1M
-4.47%
YTD
-12.44%
6M
-14.32%
1Y
-10.80%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXG vs. BPAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IXG
iShares Global Financials ETF
-0.23%28.54%25.69%14.97%0.18%
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
-12.44%8.54%17.28%13.19%-16.39%

Correlation

The correlation between IXG and BPAY is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2022

0.79

The correlation between IXG and BPAY shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXG vs. BPAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IXG
BPAY

Financial Services

97.8%
53.0%

Technology

1.1%
36.4%

Industrials

0.2%
4.6%

Energy

0.1%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%
6.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

IXG
97.8%
BPAY
53.0%

Technology

IXG
1.1%
BPAY
36.4%

Industrials

IXG
0.2%
BPAY
4.6%

Energy

IXG
0.1%
BPAY

-

Healthcare

IXG
0.1%
BPAY

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXG
0.1%
BPAY
6.0%

Basic Materials

IXG

-

BPAY

-

Communication Services

IXG

-

BPAY

-

Consumer Defensive

IXG

-

BPAY

-

Real Estate

IXG

-

BPAY
2.2%

Utilities

IXG

-

BPAY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IXG vs. BPAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IXG
IXG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
IXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
IXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

BPAY
BPAY Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BPAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BPAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BPAY Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BPAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
BPAY Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXG vs. BPAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) and BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IXGBPAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

0.95

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.13

-0.32

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.97

-0.64

+4.60

IXG vs. BPAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXG Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the BPAY Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXG and BPAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IXGBPAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

-0.42

+1.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.06

+0.18

Drawdowns

IXG vs. BPAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXG drawdown since its inception was -78.42%, which is greater than BPAY's maximum drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXG and BPAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IXGBPAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.42%

-33.62%

-44.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.33%

-33.62%

+22.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.54%

-33.62%

+20.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-26.03%

+23.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.75%

-10.54%

-9.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.21%

16.98%

-13.77%

Volatility

IXG vs. BPAY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Financials ETF (IXG) is 3.70%, while BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF (BPAY) has a volatility of 6.91%. This indicates that IXG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BPAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IXGBPAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

6.91%

-3.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.90%

18.71%

-7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.67%

26.01%

-12.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.34%

24.35%

-7.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.12%

24.35%

-4.23%

IXG vs. BPAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXG has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than BPAY's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

IXG vs. BPAY - Dividend Comparison

IXG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, less than BPAY's 7.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BPAY
BlackRock Future Financial and Technology ETF
7.41%6.49%0.48%1.18%0.18%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IXG
iShares Global Financials ETF
2.05%2.04%2.64%2.62%3.71%1.69%2.13%2.87%3.14%2.12%2.21%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


IXG and BPAY have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BPAY has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to IXG (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXG dropped -78.42% vs BPAY's -33.62%.

On 3-year performance, IXG leads with 22.63% vs 8.49% for BPAY. On fees, IXG is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, IXG has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, IXG has performed better with a 22.63% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IXG is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BPAY.

BPAY has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 2.05% for IXG.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and BlackRock. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for IXG and 0.70% for BPAY.

IXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXG and BPAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer