PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IXC vs. XME
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IXC vs. XME

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) and XME (SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while XME is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXC returned 10.05%/yr vs 19.60%/yr for XME. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XME.

Performance

IXC vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 29.17% return, which is significantly higher than XME's 16.32% return. Over the past 10 years, IXC has underperformed XME with an annualized return of 10.05%, while XME has yielded a comparatively higher 19.60% annualized return.

IXC

1D
0.28%
1M
-3.42%
YTD
29.17%
6M
28.84%
1Y
36.66%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
19.14%
10Y*
10.05%

XME

1D
1.77%
1M
4.20%
YTD
16.32%
6M
18.13%
1Y
85.07%
3Y*
35.23%
5Y*
21.78%
10Y*
19.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXC vs. XME - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF		29.17%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%5.54%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF		16.32%83.47%-4.54%21.51%13.13%34.92%15.95%14.69%-26.78%21.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IXC and XME is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between IXC and XME has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IXC vs. XME - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IXC
XME

Energy

100.0%
23.8%

Basic Materials

-

74.9%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

0.8%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

2.2%

Utilities

-

-

Energy

IXC
100.0%
XME
23.8%

Basic Materials

IXC

-

XME
74.9%

Communication Services

IXC

-

XME

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXC

-

XME

-

Consumer Defensive

IXC

-

XME
0.8%

Financial Services

IXC

-

XME

-

Healthcare

IXC

-

XME

-

Industrials

IXC

-

XME
0.4%

Real Estate

IXC

-

XME

-

Technology

IXC

-

XME
2.2%

Utilities

IXC

-

XME

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Energy ETF

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

Often compared with IXC:
IXC vs. XLEIXC vs. VDEIXC vs. IYEIXC vs. OIHIXC vs. IUES.LIXC vs. DDMIXC vs. XDW0.DE
Often compared with XME:
XME vs. PICKXME vs. SETMXME vs. SLXXME vs. XBM.TOXME vs. VAWXME vs. VOOXME vs. QQQ

Return for Risk

IXC vs. XME — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
XME
XME Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
XME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XME Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
XME Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
XME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XME Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXC vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IXCXMEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.08
2.41

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.70
2.86

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.37

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

3.84

+0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.55

9.58

+1.97

IXC vs. XME - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the XME Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXC and XME, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXC vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and XME.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IXCXMEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.88%

-85.89%

+18.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-22.60%

+12.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-30.47%

+11.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-37.27%

+12.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

-61.69%

-2.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.04%

-9.33%

+2.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.47%

-44.09%

+26.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.38%

9.05%

-5.67%

Volatility

IXC vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) is 6.44%, while SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) has a volatility of 15.26%. This indicates that IXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IXCXMEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.44%

15.26%

-8.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.63%

28.51%

-12.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.79%

36.11%

-17.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.53%

32.84%

-9.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.84%

32.96%

-6.12%

IXC vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IXC vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than XME's 0.32% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF		2.85%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF		0.32%0.38%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

IXC and XME have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XME has higher volatility (15.26%) compared to IXC (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs XME's -85.89%.

On 10-year performance, XME leads with 19.60% vs 10.05% for IXC. On fees, XME is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IXC has been the lower-risk option at 6.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XME has performed better with a 19.60% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XME is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.

IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.32% for XME.

IXC is categorized as Energy Equities, while XME is Materials. IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while XME tracks S&P Metals & Mining Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IXC and 0.35% for XME.

XME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXC and XME

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer