IXC vs. VIG
IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXC returned 10.05%/yr vs 13.24%/yr for VIG. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
IXC vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 29.17% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.68% return. Over the past 10 years, IXC has underperformed VIG with an annualized return of 10.05%, while VIG has yielded a comparatively higher 13.24% annualized return.
IXC
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 29.17%
- 6M
- 28.84%
- 1Y
- 36.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 19.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
VIG
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 19.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.24%
IXC vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 29.17% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.68% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 23.76% | 15.43% | 29.62% | -2.08% | 22.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXC and VIG is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2006 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IXC and VIG has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IXC vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IXC
VIG
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
IXC
VIG
Basic Materials
IXC
-
VIG
Communication Services
IXC
-
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
IXC
-
VIG
Consumer Defensive
IXC
-
VIG
Financial Services
IXC
-
VIG
Healthcare
IXC
-
VIG
Industrials
IXC
-
VIG
Real Estate
IXC
-
VIG
-
Technology
IXC
-
VIG
Utilities
IXC
-
VIG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXC vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
IXC
VIG
IXC vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXC | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 2.32 | +1.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.55 | 9.34 | +2.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXC vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than VIG's maximum drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXC | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.88% | -46.81% | -21.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -7.91% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -14.95% | -4.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -20.39% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.16% | -31.72% | -32.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.04% | -0.33% | -6.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.47% | -5.51% | -11.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 1.96% | +1.42% |
Volatility
IXC vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a higher volatility of 6.44% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.93%. This indicates that IXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXC | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 2.93% | +3.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.63% | 7.78% | +7.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 10.19% | +8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.53% | 14.25% | +9.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.84% | 16.06% | +10.78% |
IXC vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXC vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.85% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXC and VIG have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IXC has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to VIG (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 10-year performance, VIG leads with 13.24% vs 10.05% for IXC. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VIG has performed better with a 13.24% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.
IXC has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 1.47% for VIG.
IXC is categorized as Energy Equities, while VIG is Dividend. IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while VIG tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IXC and 0.04% for VIG.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXC and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer