PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
IXC vs. ENFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

IXC vs. ENFR

Last updated Jun 12, 2026

IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - IXC tracks the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index while ENFR tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXC returned 9.93%/yr vs 12.09%/yr for ENFR. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IXC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

IXC vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 28.81% return, which is significantly higher than ENFR's 25.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IXC has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 9.93%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.09% annualized return.

IXC

1D
-1.12%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
28.81%
6M
27.41%
1Y
39.54%
3Y*
17.54%
5Y*
19.08%
10Y*
9.93%

ENFR

1D
-0.75%
1M
0.28%
YTD
25.06%
6M
25.48%
1Y
26.53%
3Y*
28.18%
5Y*
19.26%
10Y*
12.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IXC vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF		28.81%13.98%1.95%3.92%48.51%40.88%-31.00%12.67%-14.85%5.54%
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF		25.06%5.88%42.17%15.63%17.48%39.97%-24.14%21.60%-18.67%-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between IXC and ENFR is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013

0.77

The correlation between IXC and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IXC vs. ENFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
IXC
ENFR

Energy

100.0%
98.8%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

3.4%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

1.0%

Energy

IXC
100.0%
ENFR
98.8%

Basic Materials

IXC

-

ENFR

-

Communication Services

IXC

-

ENFR

-

Consumer Cyclical

IXC

-

ENFR

-

Consumer Defensive

IXC

-

ENFR

-

Financial Services

IXC

-

ENFR
0.2%

Healthcare

IXC

-

ENFR

-

Industrials

IXC

-

ENFR
3.4%

Real Estate

IXC

-

ENFR

-

Technology

IXC

-

ENFR

-

Utilities

IXC

-

ENFR
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Global Energy ETF

Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF

Often compared with IXC:
IXC vs. XLEIXC vs. VDEIXC vs. IYEIXC vs. OIHIXC vs. IUES.LIXC vs. DDMIXC vs. XDW0.DE
Often compared with ENFR:
ENFR vs. AMLPENFR vs. MLPXENFR vs. TPYPENFR vs. EMLPENFR vs. UMIENFR vs. MPLXENFR vs. ATMP

Return for Risk

IXC vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
IXC
IXC Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
IXC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IXC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
IXC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IXC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IXC Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IXC vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

IXCENFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.11
1.82

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.73
2.52

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.31

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

3.08

+1.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.84

8.21

+3.62

IXC vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IXC Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IXC and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IXC vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, roughly equal to the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and ENFR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

IXCENFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.88%

-68.28%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-8.64%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

-15.58%

-3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-20.29%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.16%

-62.64%

-1.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.29%

-4.61%

-2.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.47%

-15.96%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

3.24%

+0.11%

Volatility

IXC vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 5.61%. This indicates that IXC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

IXCENFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.43%

5.61%

+0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.64%

11.52%

+4.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.83%

14.67%

+4.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.54%

19.31%

+4.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.84%

24.66%

+2.18%

IXC vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

IXC vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, less than ENFR's 4.01% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF		4.01%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF		2.86%3.68%4.56%3.45%4.76%3.98%4.86%7.00%3.51%3.05%2.86%3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

IXC and ENFR have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IXC has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to ENFR (5.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

On 10-year performance, ENFR leads with 12.09% vs 9.93% for IXC. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IXC.

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 2.86% for IXC.

IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IXC and 0.35% for ENFR.

IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IXC and ENFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer