IXC vs. CEF
IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) and CEF (Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust) are both funds - IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index, while CEF is a Gold fund actively managed by Sprott. IXC is passively managed, while CEF is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, IXC returned 10.05%/yr vs 12.56%/yr for CEF. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IXC charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for CEF.
Performance
IXC vs. CEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IXC achieves a 29.17% return, which is significantly higher than CEF's -4.91% return. Over the past 10 years, IXC has underperformed CEF with an annualized return of 10.05%, while CEF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.56% annualized return.
IXC
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 29.17%
- 6M
- 28.84%
- 1Y
- 36.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.43%
- 5Y*
- 19.14%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
CEF
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -9.04%
- YTD
- -4.91%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 40.89%
- 3Y*
- 33.17%
- 5Y*
- 16.96%
- 10Y*
- 12.56%
IXC vs. CEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 29.17% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | -4.91% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -8.32% | 31.99% | 16.91% | -6.34% | 18.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between IXC and CEF is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2001 | 0.22 |
The correlation between IXC and CEF shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IXC vs. CEF — Risk / Return Rank
IXC
CEF
IXC vs. CEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IXC | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.22 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | 1.41 | +2.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.55 | 3.72 | +7.84 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IXC vs. CEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IXC drawdown since its inception was -67.88%, which is greater than CEF's maximum drawdown of -62.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IXC and CEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IXC | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.88% | -62.29% | -5.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -30.01% | +20.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.06% | -30.01% | +10.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.93% | -30.01% | +5.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.16% | -30.01% | -34.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.04% | -26.45% | +19.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.47% | -27.33% | +9.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.38% | 11.35% | -7.97% |
Volatility
IXC vs. CEF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) is 6.44%, while Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) has a volatility of 11.51%. This indicates that IXC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IXC | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.44% | 11.51% | -5.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.63% | 36.13% | -20.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.79% | 38.81% | -20.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.53% | 24.54% | -1.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.84% | 21.96% | +4.88% |
IXC vs. CEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IXC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CEF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
IXC vs. CEF - Dividend Comparison
IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, while CEF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.85% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IXC and CEF have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CEF has higher volatility (11.51%) compared to IXC (6.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IXC dropped -67.88% vs CEF's -62.29%.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IXC and CEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer