PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IWY vs. IWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IWY vs. IWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IWY achieves a 7.56% return, which is significantly lower than IWX's 14.74% return. Over the past 10 years, IWY has outperformed IWX with an annualized return of 19.57%, while IWX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.67% annualized return.


IWY

1D
0.34%
1M
5.74%
YTD
7.56%
6M
6.81%
1Y
26.62%
3Y*
25.64%
5Y*
16.52%
10Y*
19.57%

IWX

1D
0.84%
1M
4.24%
YTD
14.74%
6M
15.73%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IWY vs. IWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
7.56%18.19%34.89%46.49%-29.91%31.05%39.01%36.20%-0.72%31.69%
IWX
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
14.74%18.23%14.89%10.45%-5.33%23.33%1.46%25.82%-6.53%14.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IWY and IWX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2009

0.71

The correlation between IWY and IWX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IWY vs. IWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IWY
IWX

Technology

54.9%
14.2%

Communication Services

13.9%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
6.8%

Healthcare

6.6%
12.5%

Financial Services

5.6%
21.5%

Industrials

4.0%
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
8.2%

Utilities

1.1%
3.2%

Real Estate

0.3%
1.9%

Basic Materials

0.3%
3.0%

Energy

0.0%
6.4%

Technology

IWY
54.9%
IWX
14.2%

Communication Services

IWY
13.9%
IWX
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

IWY
11.4%
IWX
6.8%

Healthcare

IWY
6.6%
IWX
12.5%

Financial Services

IWY
5.6%
IWX
21.5%

Industrials

IWY
4.0%
IWX
11.3%

Consumer Defensive

IWY
3.0%
IWX
8.2%

Utilities

IWY
1.1%
IWX
3.2%

Real Estate

IWY
0.3%
IWX
1.9%

Basic Materials

IWY
0.3%
IWX
3.0%

Energy

IWY
0.0%
IWX
6.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IWY vs. IWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWY
IWY Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
IWY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWY Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWY Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IWY Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWY Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

IWX
IWX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
IWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
IWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IWY vs. IWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) and iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IWYIWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.55

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.61

4.63

-3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.24

19.89

-14.65

IWY vs. IWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IWY Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the IWX Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IWY and IWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IWYIWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

3.05

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.82

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

0.71

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.71

+0.22

Drawdowns

IWY vs. IWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IWY drawdown since its inception was -32.68%, smaller than the maximum IWX drawdown of -35.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWY and IWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IWYIWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.68%

-35.76%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.63%

-6.59%

-10.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-13.37%

-9.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.68%

-18.13%

-14.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.68%

-35.76%

+3.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.49%

0.00%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.75%

-3.82%

-0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

1.53%

+3.56%

Volatility

IWY vs. IWX - Volatility Comparison

iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) at 2.76%. This indicates that IWY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IWYIWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.69%

2.76%

+0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.65%

7.69%

+3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.53%

10.04%

+5.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.47%

13.85%

+7.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.97%

16.51%

+4.46%

IWY vs. IWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IWY and IWX have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IWY vs. IWX - Dividend Comparison

IWY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than IWX's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWX
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
1.47%1.59%1.97%2.13%2.07%1.79%2.12%2.60%2.66%2.12%2.22%2.77%
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
0.33%0.36%0.42%0.68%0.88%0.50%0.71%1.06%1.32%1.26%1.51%1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


IWY and IWX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWY has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to IWX (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWY dropped -32.68% vs IWX's -35.76%.

On 10-year performance, IWY leads with 19.57% vs 11.67% for IWX. Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. On volatility, IWX has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IWY has performed better with a 19.57% return vs 11.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWY and IWX have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

IWX has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.33% for IWY.

IWY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IWX is Large Cap Value Equities. IWY tracks Russell Top 200 Growth Index, while IWX tracks Russell Top 200 Value Index.

IWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IWY and IWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer