IWX vs. VT
IWX (iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IWX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell Top 200 Value Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IWX returned 11.66%/yr vs 12.74%/yr for VT. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IWX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
IWX vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IWX achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 12.24% return. Over the past 10 years, IWX has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 11.66%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.74% annualized return.
IWX
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.49%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 28.65%
- 3Y*
- 18.86%
- 5Y*
- 11.06%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
VT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
IWX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 13.79% | 18.23% | 14.89% | 10.45% | -5.33% | 23.33% | 1.46% | 25.82% | -6.53% | 14.05% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.24% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between IWX and VT is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2009 | 0.85 |
The correlation between IWX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
IWX vs. VT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IWX
VT
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
IWX
VT
Technology
IWX
VT
Healthcare
IWX
VT
Industrials
IWX
VT
Communication Services
IWX
VT
Consumer Defensive
IWX
VT
Consumer Cyclical
IWX
VT
Energy
IWX
VT
Utilities
IWX
VT
Basic Materials
IWX
VT
Real Estate
IWX
VT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IWX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
IWX
VT
IWX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IWX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.42 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.37 | 3.04 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.76 | 13.53 | +5.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IWX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.87 | 2.31 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.69 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.74 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.70 | 0.44 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
IWX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IWX drawdown since its inception was -35.76%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IWX and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IWX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.76% | -50.27% | +14.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.59% | -9.67% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.37% | -16.51% | +3.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.13% | -26.38% | +8.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.76% | -34.24% | -1.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.88% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.82% | -7.02% | +3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.53% | 2.17% | -0.64% |
Volatility
IWX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF (IWX) is 2.83%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that IWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IWX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 3.83% | -1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 10.17% | -2.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.02% | 12.70% | -2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.85% | 16.05% | -2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 17.23% | -0.72% |
IWX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IWX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IWX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
IWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than VT's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IWX iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF | 1.48% | 1.59% | 1.97% | 2.13% | 2.07% | 1.79% | 2.12% | 2.60% | 2.66% | 2.12% | 2.22% | 2.77% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IWX and VT have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VT has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to IWX (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IWX dropped -35.76% vs VT's -50.27%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.74% vs 11.66% for IWX. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IWX has been the lower-risk option at 2.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 11.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IWX.
VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 1.48% for IWX.
IWX is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VT is Global Equities. IWX tracks Russell Top 200 Value Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IWX and 0.06% for VT.
IWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IWX and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer